Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Emulating Control Arms for Cancer Clinical Trials Using External Cohorts Created From Electronic Health Record-Derived Real-World Data.
Tan, Katherine; Bryan, Jonathan; Segal, Brian; Bellomo, Lawrence; Nussbaum, Nate; Tucker, Melisa; Torres, Aracelis Z; Bennette, Carrie; Capra, William; Curtis, Melissa; Miksad, Rebecca A.
Afiliación
  • Tan K; Flatiron Health, Inc., New York, New York, USA.
  • Bryan J; Flatiron Health, Inc., New York, New York, USA.
  • Segal B; Flatiron Health, Inc., New York, New York, USA.
  • Bellomo L; Flatiron Health, Inc., New York, New York, USA.
  • Nussbaum N; Flatiron Health, Inc., New York, New York, USA.
  • Tucker M; Flatiron Health, Inc., New York, New York, USA.
  • Torres AZ; Flatiron Health, Inc., New York, New York, USA.
  • Bennette C; Flatiron Health, Inc., New York, New York, USA.
  • Capra W; Genentech, South San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Curtis M; Flatiron Health, Inc., New York, New York, USA.
  • Miksad RA; Flatiron Health, Inc., New York, New York, USA.
Clin Pharmacol Ther ; 111(1): 168-178, 2022 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34197637
ABSTRACT
Electronic health record (EHR)-derived real-world data (RWD) can be sourced to create external comparator cohorts to oncology clinical trials. This exploratory study assessed whether EHR-derived patient cohorts could emulate select clinical trial control arms across multiple tumor types. The impact of analytic decisions on emulation results was also evaluated. By digitizing Kaplan-Meier curves, we reconstructed published control arm results from 15 trials that supported drug approvals from January 1, 2016, to April 30, 2018. RWD cohorts were constructed using a nationwide EHR-derived de-identified database by aligning eligibility criteria and weighting to trial baseline characteristics. Trial data and RWD cohorts were compared using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression models for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS; individual cohorts) and multitumor random effects models of hazard ratios (HRs) for median endpoint correlations (across cohorts). Post hoc, the impact of specific analytic decisions on endpoints was assessed using a case study. Comparing trial data and weighted RWD cohorts, PFS results were more similar (HR range = 0.63-1.18, pooled HR = 0.84, correlation of median = 0.91) compared to OS (HR range = 0.36-1.09, pooled HR = 0.76, correlation of median = 0.85). OS HRs were more variable and trended toward worse for RWD cohorts. The post hoc case study had OS HR ranging from 0.67 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56-0.79) to 0.92 (95% CI 0.78-1.09) depending on specific analytic decisions. EHR-derived RWD can emulate oncology clinical trial control arm results, although with variability. Visibility into clinical trial cohort characteristics may shape and refine analytic approaches.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto / Registros Electrónicos de Salud Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Pharmacol Ther Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto / Registros Electrónicos de Salud Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Pharmacol Ther Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos