Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Metastatic Risk Factors Associated with Class 1A Uveal Melanoma Patients.
Ballhausen, Alexej; Urias, Elizabeth; Gruschkus, Stephen K; Williams, Michelle; Glover, Maura S; Qin, Yong; Gombos, Dan S; Patel, Sapna P.
Afiliación
  • Ballhausen A; Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
  • Urias E; Medical Department, Division of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
  • Gruschkus SK; Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Ophthalmology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
  • Williams M; Division of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
  • Glover MS; Department of Pathology, Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
  • Qin Y; Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
  • Gombos DS; Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79902, USA.
  • Patel SP; Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Ophthalmology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Cancers (Basel) ; 13(13)2021 Jun 30.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34209210
ABSTRACT
In uveal melanoma (UM), gene expression profiling (GEP) is commonly used to classify metastatic risk into three groups (Class 1A, 1B, and 2). Class 1A patients have a lower metastatic risk of 2% at 5 years compared to other groups. We aimed to describe clinical features associated with the development of metastasis in this low-risk group. This single-center IRB-approved retrospective case series review included all UM patients between February 2006 and March 2019 with an archived or fresh specimen classified as Class 1A. Cox regression and receiver operating characteristics analyses were used to identify factors associated with metastasis development and OS. Among 73 UM patients with Class 1A, the 5-year cumulative incidence of local recurrence and distant metastasis was 4.2% and 17.0%, respectively. Stage III disease (HR 20.7; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.4-300.6; p = 0.0264) was found to be independently associated with metastatic recurrence, while primary therapy was associated with OS (enucleation vs. brachytherapy, HR 13.5; 95% CI 1.3-147.6; p = 0.0348). Combined clinical decision-making utilizing factors such as GEP class, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, and COMS size could have a significant clinical impact by improving risk stratification and adapting follow-up intervals in UM Class 1A patients.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Cancers (Basel) Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Cancers (Basel) Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos