Identification of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius Isolates from Wound Cultures by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry Improves Accuracy of Susceptibility Reporting at an Increase in Cost.

Staphylococcus pseudintermedius can easily be mistaken for Staphylococcus aureus using phenotypic and rapid biochemical methods. We began confirming the identification of all coagulase-positive staphylococci isolated from human wound cultures at our centralized laboratory, servicing both community and inpatients, with matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry instead of using phenotypic and rapid biochemical tests, and determined the prevalence of S. pseudintermedius since the change in identification procedure and at what cost. A retrospective review was performed on all wound swab cultures from which coagulase-positive staphylococci were isolated 7 months before and after the change in identification procedure. A total of 49 S. intermedius/pseudintermedius (SIP) isolates were identified, including 7 isolates from 14,401 wound cultures in the before period and 42 isolates from 14,147 wound cultures in the after period. The number of SIP isolates as a proportion of isolated coagulase-positive staphylococci increased significantly from the before, 7/6,351 (0.1%), to the after, 42/5,435 (0.7%), period (difference, 0.6% [95% confidence interval, 0.037 to 0.83%, P < 0.0001]). Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed in 42 isolates; none had an oxacillin MIC of 1.0 to 2.0 µg/ml, the range in which, if the isolate was misidentified as S. aureus, a very major error in susceptibility interpretation would occur. The increase in cost of the change in identification procedure was Can$17,558 per year in our laboratory, performing microbiology testing for community and acute-care patients in a zone servicing nearly 1.7 million people. While we will only continue to learn more about this emerging pathogen if we make attempts to properly identify it in clinical cultures, the additional time and cost involved may be unacceptably high in some laboratories. .