Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Long Term Restenosis Rate After Carotid Endarterectomy: Comparison of Three Surgical Techniques and Intra-Operative Shunt Use.
Cheng, Suk F; Richards, Toby; Gregson, John; Brown, Martin M; de Borst, Gert J; Bonati, Leo H.
Afiliación
  • Cheng SF; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
  • Richards T; Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Surgery, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
  • Gregson J; Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
  • Brown MM; Stroke Research Centre, Department of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, UK. Electronic address: martin.brown@ucl.ac.uk.
  • de Borst GJ; Department of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Bonati LH; Department of Neurology and Stroke Centre, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 62(4): 513-521, 2021 10.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34452836
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Closure of the artery during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) can be done with or without a patch, or performed with the eversion technique, while the use of intra-operative shunts is optional. The influence of these techniques on subsequent restenosis is uncertain. Long term carotid restenosis rates and risk of future ipsilateral stroke with these techniques were compared.

METHODS:

Patients who underwent CEA in the International Carotid Stenting Study were divided into patch angioplasty, primary closure, or eversion endarterectomy. Intra-operative shunt use was reported. Carotid duplex ultrasound was performed at each follow up. Primary outcomes were restenosis of ≥ 50% and ≥ 70%, and ipsilateral stroke after the procedure to the end of follow up.

RESULTS:

In total, 790 CEA patients had restenosis data at one and five years. Altogether, 511 (64.7%) had patch angioplasty, 232 (29.4%) primary closure, and 47 (5.9%) eversion endarterectomy. The cumulative incidence of ≥ 50% restenosis at one year was 18.9%, 26.1%, and 17.7%, respectively, and at five years it was 25.9%, 37.2%, and 30.0%, respectively. There was no difference in risk between the eversion and patch angioplasty group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45 - 1.81; p = .77). Primary closure had a higher risk of restenosis than patch angioplasty (HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.06 - 1.98; p = .019). The cumulative incidence of ≥ 70% restenosis did not differ between primary closure and patch angioplasty (12.1% vs. 7.1%, HR 1.59, 95% CI 0.88 - 2.89; p = .12) or between patch angioplasty and eversion endarterectomy (4.7%, HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.06 - 3.35; p = .44). There was no effect of shunt use on the cumulative incidence of restenosis. Post-procedural ipsilateral stroke was not more common in either of the surgical techniques or shunt use.

CONCLUSION:

Restenosis was more common after primary closure than conventionally with a patch closure. Shunt use had no effect on restenosis. Patch closure is the treatment of choice to avoid restenosis.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Arterias Carótidas / Endarterectomía Carotidea / Estenosis Carotídea Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Arterias Carótidas / Endarterectomía Carotidea / Estenosis Carotídea Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido