Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
UK national bladder outlet obstruction surgery snapshot audit.
Aning, Jonathan J; Calvert, Robert C; Harding, Chris; Fowler, Sarah; Nitkunan, Tharani; Lee, Su-Min; McGrath, John S; Cresswell, Joanne; Hagan, Patricia; Hermans, Louisa; Dickinson, Andrew J.
Afiliación
  • Aning JJ; Bristol Urological Institute, North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK.
  • Calvert RC; Department of Urology, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
  • Harding C; Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
  • Fowler S; British Association of Urological Surgeons, London, UK.
  • Nitkunan T; Department of Urology, Epsom and St Hellier University Hospitals NHS Trust, Epsom, UK.
  • Lee SM; Department of Urology, Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Bath, UK.
  • McGrath JS; Exeter Surgical Health Services Research Unit, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, Devon, UK.
  • Cresswell J; Department of Urology, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.
  • Hagan P; British Association of Urological Surgeons, London, UK.
  • Hermans L; British Association of Urological Surgeons, London, UK.
  • Dickinson AJ; Department of Urology, University Hospitals Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
BJU Int ; 129(5): 634-641, 2022 05.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34617385
OBJECTIVES: To determine the preoperative assessment and perioperative outcomes of men undergoing bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) surgery in the UK. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of all men undergoing BOO surgery in 105 UK hospitals over a 1-month period. The study included 1456 men, of whom 42% were catheter dependent prior to undergoing surgery. RESULTS: There was no evidence that a frequency-volume chart or urinary symptom questionnaire had been completed in 73% or 50% of men, respectively in the non-catheter-dependent group. Bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) was the most common BOO surgical procedure performed (38%). Monopolar TURP was the next most prevalent modality (23%); however, minimally invasive BOO surgical procedures combined accounted for 17% of all procedures performed. Of the cohort 5% of men had complications within 30 days of surgery, only 1% had Clavien-Dindo Grade ≥III complications. Less than 1% of the cohort received a blood transfusion after BOO surgery and 2% were re-admitted to hospital after their BOO surgery. In total only 4% of the whole cohort were catheter dependent after BOO surgery. Pre- and postoperative paired International Prostate Symptom Score scores reviewed suggest that minimally invasive surgical procedures achieved comparable levels of improvement in both symptoms and bother at 3 months postoperatively in men who were not catheter dependent preoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: There has been a substantial shift in the available choice of procedure for BOO surgery around the UK in recent years. However, men can be reassured that overall BOO surgery treatments are safe and effective. Evidence of adherence to guidelines in the preoperative assessment of men with lower urinary tract symptoms undergoing surgery was poorly documented and must be improved.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Hiperplasia Prostática / Obstrucción del Cuello de la Vejiga Urinaria / Resección Transuretral de la Próstata Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Female / Humans / Male País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: BJU Int Asunto de la revista: UROLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Hiperplasia Prostática / Obstrucción del Cuello de la Vejiga Urinaria / Resección Transuretral de la Próstata Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Female / Humans / Male País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: BJU Int Asunto de la revista: UROLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article