Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Including a pen and/or cover letter, containing social incentive text, had no effect on questionnaire response rate: a factorial randomised controlled Study within a Trial.
James, Sophie; Parker, Adwoa; Cockayne, Sarah; Rodgers, Sara; Fairhurst, Caroline; Torgerson, David J; Rhodes, Sarah; Cotterill, Sarah.
Afiliación
  • James S; York Trials Unit, University of York, UK, York, Y010 5DD, UK.
  • Parker A; York Trials Unit, University of York, UK, York, Y010 5DD, UK.
  • Cockayne S; York Trials Unit, University of York, UK, York, Y010 5DD, UK.
  • Rodgers S; York Trials Unit, University of York, UK, York, Y010 5DD, UK.
  • Fairhurst C; York Trials Unit, University of York, UK, York, Y010 5DD, UK.
  • Torgerson DJ; York Trials Unit, University of York, UK, York, Y010 5DD, UK.
  • Rhodes S; Centre for Biostatistics, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
  • Cotterill S; Centre for Biostatistics, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
F1000Res ; 9: 623, 2020.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35106140
Background: Postal questionnaires are frequently used in randomised controlled trials to collect outcome data on participants; however, poor response can introduce bias, affect generalisability and validity, and reduce statistical power. The objective of this study was to assess whether a pen and/or social incentive text cover letter sent with a postal follow-up questionnaire increased response rates in a trial. Method: A two-by-two factorial randomised controlled trial was embedded within the OTIS host trial. Participants due their 12-month (final) follow-up questionnaire were randomised to be sent: a pen; a social incentive text cover letter; both; or neither. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of participants in each group who returned the questionnaire. Secondary outcomes were: time to return, completeness of the questionnaire, necessity of a reminder letter, and the cost effectiveness. Results: The overall 12-month questionnaire response rate was 721 out of 755 (95.5%). Neither the pen nor social incentive cover letter had a statistically significant effect on response rate: pen 95.2% vs. no pen 95.8%, adjusted OR 0.90 (95% CI 0.45 to 1.80; p=0.77); social incentive cover letter 95.2% vs. no social incentive cover letter 95.8%, adjusted OR 0.84 (95% CI 0.42 to 1.69, p=0.63). No statistically significant differences were observed between either of the intervention groups on time to response, need for a reminder or completeness. Therefore, neither intervention was cost-effective. Conclusions: We found no evidence of a difference in response rates associated with the inclusion of a pen and/or social incentive cover letter with the final follow-up postal questionnaire of the host trial. However, when these results are combined with previous SWATs, the meta-analysis evidence remains that including a pen increases response rates. The social incentive cover letter warrants further investigation to determine effectiveness. Trial registration: ISRCTN22202133 (21st June 2020).
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: F1000Res Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: F1000Res Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article