Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Rural healthcare delivery and maternal and infant outcomes for diabetes in pregnancy: A systematic review.
Payne, Ellen; Palmer, Gwendolyn; Rollo, Megan; Ryan, Kate; Harrison, Sandra; Collins, Clare; Wynne, Katie; Brown, Leanne J; Schumacher, Tracy.
Afiliación
  • Payne E; Department of Rural Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Tamworth, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Palmer G; School of Health Sciences, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Tamworth, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Rollo M; Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department, The Tweed Hospital, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Ryan K; School of Health Sciences, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Tamworth, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Harrison S; Priority Research Centre in Physical Activity and Nutrition, University of Newcastle, Tamworth, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Collins C; Diabetes Unit, Tamworth Rural Referral Hospital, Tamworth, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Wynne K; Diabetes Unit, Tamworth Rural Referral Hospital, Tamworth, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Brown LJ; School of Health Sciences, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Tamworth, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Schumacher T; Priority Research Centre in Physical Activity and Nutrition, University of Newcastle, Tamworth, New South Wales, Australia.
Nutr Diet ; 79(1): 48-58, 2022 02.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35128769
ABSTRACT

AIM:

The aim of this systematic review was to examine the literature regarding rural healthcare delivery for women with any type of diabetes in pregnancy, and subsequent maternal and infant outcomes.

METHODS:

Eight databases were searched in September 2020, including Medline, EMCare, CINAHL, EMBASE, Maternity and Infant Care, Cochrane, Rural and Remote Health and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health bibliography. Studies from high-income countries in rural, regional or remote areas with interventions conducted during the antenatal period were included. Intervention details were reported using the template for intervention description and replication template. Two reviewers independently assessed for risk of bias using the RoB2 and ROBINS I tools.

RESULTS:

Three articles met the inclusion criteria two conducted in Australia and one in the United States. A multidisciplinary approach was reported in two of the included studies, which were modified specifically for their respective rural settings. All three studies reported rates of caesarean section, birthweight (grams) and gestational age at birth as maternal and infant outcomes. One study was considered at moderate risk of bias, and two studies were at serious risk of bias.

CONCLUSION:

There is a significant gap in research relating to healthcare delivery for women with diabetes in pregnancy in rural areas. This lack of research is concerning given that 19% of individuals in high-income countries reside rurally. Further research is required to understand the implications of healthcare delivery models for diabetes in pregnancy in rural areas.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cesárea / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Female / Humans / Infant / Newborn / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Nutr Diet Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cesárea / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Female / Humans / Infant / Newborn / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Nutr Diet Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia