Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparable efficacy of denosumab and romosozumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving glucocorticoid administration.
Kobayakawa, Tomonori; Miyazaki, Akiko; Kanayama, Yasuhide; Hirano, Yuji; Takahashi, Jun; Suzuki, Takako; Nakamura, Yukio.
Afiliación
  • Kobayakawa T; Kobayakawa Orthopedic and Rheumatologic Clinic, Shizuoka, Japan.
  • Miyazaki A; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan.
  • Kanayama Y; Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Rheumatology, Toyota Kosei Hospital, Toyota, Aichi, Japan.
  • Hirano Y; Department of Rheumatology, Toyohashi Municipal Hospital, Toyohashi, Aichi, Japan.
  • Takahashi J; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan.
  • Suzuki T; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan.
  • Nakamura Y; Department of Human Nutrition, Faculty of Human Nutrition, Tokyo Kasei Gakuin University, Tokyo, Japan.
Mod Rheumatol ; 33(1): 96-103, 2023 Jan 03.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35234889
OBJECTIVES: Romosozumab is a newly released and widely known molecular-targeted drug for severe osteoporosis treatment with comparable effectiveness to denosumab. However, there have been no reports discussing the efficacy of those treatments for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, especially those receiving glucocorticoids. This retrospective observational registry study compared the efficacy of 12-month treatment of denosumab and romosozumab in RA patients under the influence of glucocorticoid intake. METHODS: Following propensity score matching, 36 patients each in the denosumab and romosozumab groups were analysed in this study. Drug effectiveness was evaluated by measuring bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck at baseline, 6 and 12 months as well as alterations in P1NP, TRACP-5b, and simplified disease activity index (SDAI). The occurrence of adverse events and new fractures was also assessed. RESULTS: At 12 months of treatment, BMD at the lumbar spine was increased by 7.5% in the denosumab group and 8.7% in the romosozumab group, which were both significantly and comparably elevated over baseline. At the total hip and femoral neck, romosozumab tended to exhibit favourable efficacy to increase BMD versus denosumab. Both P1NP and TRACP-5b were significantly lower in the denosumab group as compared with the baseline. Conversely in the romosozumab group, P1NP was increased over baseline, while TRACP-5b was decreased. Regarding SDAI alterations, both the romosozumab and denosumab groups exhibited comparable improvements in RA disease activity over time during treatment. Recorded adverse events and new fractures during treatment were few and minor in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Romosozumab exhibited comparable efficacy to denosumab for increasing BMD even under the influence of glucocorticoids for treating RA. Both drugs may be therefore suitable for managing osteoporosis in patients with RA and glucocorticoid intake.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Osteoporosis / Artritis Reumatoide / Fracturas Óseas / Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Mod Rheumatol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Osteoporosis / Artritis Reumatoide / Fracturas Óseas / Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Mod Rheumatol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón