Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Extended Oral Antibiotic Prophylaxis After Aseptic Revision TKA: Does It Decrease Infection Risk?
Bukowski, Brandon R; Owen, Aaron R; Turner, Travis W; Fruth, Kristin M; Osmon, Douglas R; Pagnano, Mark W; Berry, Daniel J; Abdel, Matthew P.
Afiliación
  • Bukowski BR; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
  • Owen AR; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
  • Turner TW; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
  • Fruth KM; Department of Health Sciences Research, Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
  • Osmon DR; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
  • Pagnano MW; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
  • Berry DJ; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
  • Abdel MP; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
J Arthroplasty ; 37(8S): S997-S1003.e1, 2022 08.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35307528
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Extended oral antibiotic prophylaxis (EOA) has been shown to potentially reduce infection rates after high-risk primary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) and reimplantations. However, data is limited regarding EOA after aseptic revision TKAs. This study evaluated the impact of EOA on infection-related outcomes after aseptic revision TKAs.

METHODS:

904 aseptic revision TKAs from 2014-2019 were retrospectively identified. Patients who received EOA >24 hours perioperatively (n = 267) were compared to those who did not (n = 637) using an inverse probability of treatment weighting model. Mean age was 66 years, mean BMI was 33 kg/m2, and 54% were female. Outcomes included cumulative probabilities of any infection, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), superficial infection, and re-revision or reoperation for infection.

RESULTS:

The cumulative probability of any infection after aseptic revision TKA was 1.9% at 90 days, 3.5% at 1 year, and 8.1% at 5 years. Patients without EOA had a higher risk of any infection at 90 days (HR = 7.1; P = .01), but not other time points. The cumulative probability of PJI after aseptic revision TKA was 0.8% at 90 days, 2.3% at 1 year, and 6.5% at 5 years. Patients without EOA did not have an increased risk of PJI. There were no differences in re-revision or reoperation for infection at any time point between groups.

CONCLUSION:

Extended oral antibiotics after aseptic revision TKA were associated with a 7-fold decreased risk of any infection at 90 days. The results suggest a potential role for EOA after aseptic revision TKA and warrant additional prospective studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Artritis Infecciosa / Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis / Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Arthroplasty Asunto de la revista: ORTOPEDIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Mongolia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Artritis Infecciosa / Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis / Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Arthroplasty Asunto de la revista: ORTOPEDIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Mongolia