Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacies of FAEV and EMA/CO regimens as primary treatment for gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.
Ji, Mingliang; Jiang, Shiyang; Zhao, Jun; Wan, Xirun; Feng, Fengzhi; Ren, Tong; Yang, Junjun; Xiang, Yang.
Afiliación
  • Ji M; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
  • Jiang S; National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric & Gynecologic Diseases, Beijing, China.
  • Zhao J; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
  • Wan X; National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric & Gynecologic Diseases, Beijing, China.
  • Feng F; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. zhaojun@pumch.cams.cn.
  • Ren T; National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric & Gynecologic Diseases, Beijing, China. zhaojun@pumch.cams.cn.
  • Yang J; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
  • Xiang Y; National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric & Gynecologic Diseases, Beijing, China.
Br J Cancer ; 127(3): 524-530, 2022 08.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35459802
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Guidelines recommend etoposide, methotrexate, actinomycin D (EMA)/cyclophosphamide, vincristine (CO) as first-line treatment for high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN). However, the floxuridine, actinomycin D, etoposide and vincristine (FAEV) regimen is commonly used to treat these patients in China. We conducted a randomised controlled trial to compare the efficacies and toxicities of FAEV and EMA/CO.

METHODS:

Ninety-four patients with GTN were enrolled between May 2015 and April 2019 and randomly assigned to the FAEV or EMA/CO regimen. The rates of complete remission and relapse and the toxicities were compared in August 2021.

RESULTS:

Five patients were excluded from the analysis. There were 46 patients in the FAEV group and 43 patients in the EMA/CO group. The complete remission rates following primary treatment were 89.1% and 79.1% (P = 0.193), respectively. The relapse rates were 8.7% and 9.3% (P = 0.604). The apparent incidences of grade 4 myelosuppression were 60.9% and 32.6% (P = 0.008), respectively; however, they became both 32.6% (P = 0.996) after granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support. Other adverse reactions were similar in the two groups. No patient died of disease.

CONCLUSION:

FAEV has comparable efficacy and toxicity to EMA/CO as the primary treatment for high-risk GTN, and may thus be another first-line choice of chemotherapy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION chictr.org.cn ChiCTR1800017423.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Enfermedad Trofoblástica Gestacional Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline Límite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Br J Cancer Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Enfermedad Trofoblástica Gestacional Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline Límite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Br J Cancer Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China