Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prosthetic forefoot and heel stiffness across consecutive foot stiffness categories and sizes.
Turner, Anne T; Halsne, Elizabeth G; Caputo, Joshua M; Curran, Carl S; Hansen, Andrew H; Hafner, Brian J; Morgenroth, David C.
Afiliación
  • Turner AT; VA RR&D Center for Limb Loss and Mobility (CLiMB), VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
  • Halsne EG; Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Spokane, Washington, United States of America.
  • Caputo JM; VA RR&D Center for Limb Loss and Mobility (CLiMB), VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
  • Curran CS; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
  • Hansen AH; Human Motion Technologies LLC d/b/a Humotech, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
  • Hafner BJ; Human Motion Technologies LLC d/b/a Humotech, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
  • Morgenroth DC; Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.
PLoS One ; 17(5): e0268136, 2022.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35536854
Prosthetic foot stiffness plays a key role in the functional mobility of lower limb prosthesis users. However, limited objective data exists to guide selection of the optimal prosthetic foot stiffness category for a given individual. Clinicians often must rely solely on manufacturer recommendations, which are typically based on the intended user's weight and general activity level. Availability of comparable forefoot and heel stiffness data would allow for a better understanding of differences between different commercial prosthetic feet, and also between feet of different stiffness categories and foot sizes. Therefore, this study compared forefoot and heel linear stiffness properties across manufacturer-designated stiffness categories and foot sizes. Mechanical testing was completed for five types of commercial prosthetic feet across a range of stiffness categories and three foot-sizes. Data were collected for 56 prosthetic feet, in total. Testing at two discrete angles was conducted to isolate loading of the heel and forefoot components, respectively. Each prosthetic foot was loaded for six cycles while force and displacement data were collected. Forefoot and heel measured stiffness were both significantly associated with stiffness category (p = .001). There was no evidence that the relationships between stiffness category and measured stiffness differed by foot size (stiffness category by size interaction p = .80). However, there were inconsistencies between the expected and measured stiffness changes across stiffness categories (i.e., magnitude of stiffness changes varied substantially between consecutive stiffness categories of the same feet). While statistical results support that, on average, measured stiffness is positively correlated with stiffness category, force-displacement data suggest substantial variation in measured stiffness across consecutive categories. Published objective mechanical property data for commercial prosthetic feet would likely therefore be helpful to clinicians during prescription.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Miembros Artificiales / Marcha Tipo de estudio: Guideline Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Asunto de la revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Miembros Artificiales / Marcha Tipo de estudio: Guideline Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Asunto de la revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos