Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Preoperative chemotherapy is a better strategy than upfront surgery in cT4 gastric cancer.
Dias, Andre R; Pereira, Marina A; Ramos, Marcus F K P; Ribeiro, Ulysses; Zilberstein, Bruno; Nahas, Sergio C.
Afiliación
  • Dias AR; Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
  • Pereira MA; Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
  • Ramos MFKP; Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
  • Ribeiro U; Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
  • Zilberstein B; Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
  • Nahas SC; Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
J Surg Oncol ; 126(1): 132-138, 2022 Jul.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35689585
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Chemotherapy (CMT) followed by surgery is recommended by Western countries for advanced gastric cancer (GC). However, cT4 GC usually undergoes upfront surgery, due to symptoms. This study aimed to evaluate if preoperative CMT is a better strategy than upfront surgery in cT4 GC.

METHODS:

All cT4 GCs who underwent curative gastrectomy were included. Patients were divided according to their initial treatment upfront surgery (SURG) or CMT + SURG.

RESULTS:

Among the 226 GC initially staged as cT4, 150 underwent SURG and 76 CMT + SURG. Groups were similar concerning age, comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists, gastrectomy performed, and postoperative complications. The CMT + SURG group had less advanced pTNM. Median overall survival (OS) was 32 and 58.5 months for SURG and CMT + SURG, respectively (p = 0.04). Patients who received perioperative or adjuvant CMT had better OS compared to surgery alone (49.4 vs. 15.9 months, p < 0.001). OS was similar for those receiving preoperative and adjuvant CMT. Non-CMT, pN+, and R1 resection were independent risk factors for worse OS.

CONCLUSION:

Multimodal treatment associating CMT with surgery, regardless of whether the approach is pre- or postoperative, is essential to improve the survival of cT4 GC. As tolerance to adjuvant treatment is reduced, preoperative CMT is a better strategy than upfront surgery in these patients.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Gástricas Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Surg Oncol Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Brasil

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Gástricas Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Surg Oncol Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Brasil