Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Preparation of small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) with simethicone: A meta-analysis.
Chen, Sisi; Guo, Li-Liangzi; Zhong, Lixian; Shen, Lianli; Zeng, Qiuting; Lai, Leizhen; Tang, Shaohui.
Afiliación
  • Chen S; Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, 601 Huangpu Avenue West, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510630, PR China.
  • Guo LL; Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, 601 Huangpu Avenue West, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510630, PR China.
  • Zhong L; Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, 601 Huangpu Avenue West, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510630, PR China.
  • Shen L; Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, 601 Huangpu Avenue West, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510630, PR China.
  • Zeng Q; Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, 601 Huangpu Avenue West, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510630, PR China.
  • Lai L; Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, 601 Huangpu Avenue West, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510630, PR China.
  • Tang S; Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, 601 Huangpu Avenue West, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510630, PR China. Electronic address: tangshaohui206@jnu.edu.cn.
Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol ; 46(10): 102029, 2022 12.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36202305
BACKGROUND: It is disputed about optimal bowel preparation for small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE). This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the role of simethicone in intestinal preparation for SBCE. METHODS: We searched four databases (PubMed, web of science, Embase, and Scopus databases) for relevant studies. Studies evaluating the effect of simethicone as an adjunct to SBCE bowel preparation were included. The random-effects model was applied to calculate the risk estimates. Primary outcomes include the degree of gas bubbles and small bowel visualization quality (SBVQ). Secondary outcomes include diagnostic yield (DY), gastric transit time (GTT), small bowel transit time (SBTT), and completion rate (CR). RESULTS: A total of 10 studies were included (8 RCTs, 1 prospective, and 1 retrospective study). Compared with the control group, the simethicone group showed significant improvements in the degree of gas bubbling (RR = 2.05, 95%CI:1.56-2.71, P < 0.001, I2 = 62%) and SBVQ (RR = 1.41, 95%CI: 1.20-1.65, P < 0.001, I2 = 16%). Subgroup analysis showed that the SBVQ of simethicone group was better than fasting (RR = 2.62, 95% CI:1.49-4.59, P < 0.001, I2 = 0%), mannitol (RR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.14-1.59, P < 0.001, I2 = 0%) and PEG group (RR = 1.32, 95%CI:1.06-1.65, P = 0.01, I2 = 0%). No significant associations were found for DY, GTT, SBTT, and CR. CONCLUSIONS: Simethicone for bowel preparation is useful to improve visualization and reduce the gas bubbling of SBCE.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Endoscopía Capsular Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Endoscopía Capsular Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article