Comparison of Computer-Assisted Self-Interview Versus Clinician Interview for Self-Reported Vulvovaginal Symptoms.

Robbins, Sarah J; Brown, Sarah E; Stennett, Christina A; Tuddenham, Susan; Johnston, Elizabeth D; He, Xin; Mark, Katrina S; Brotman, Rebecca M

Robbins, Sarah J; Brown, Sarah E; Stennett, Christina A; Tuddenham, Susan; Johnston, Elizabeth D; He, Xin; Mark, Katrina S; Brotman, Rebecca M.

Afiliación

Tuddenham S; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
Johnston ED; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore.
Mark KS; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore.

Sex Transm Dis ; 50(6): e2-e4, 2023 06 01.

Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36749852

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT: This secondary analysis (N = 43) compared computer-assisted self-interview (CASI) to clinician interview for self-report of 8 vulvovaginal symptoms. Concordance was moderate between interview modes (range, 70-86%) with itching and odor having highest agreement. Although prior reports suggest more responses on CASI, we found CASI did not significantly increase self-report of symptoms over clinician interview.

Asunto(s)

Computadores; Humanos; Autoinforme

Texto completo

Imprimir

XML

PubMed Links

Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Computadores Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Sex Transm Dis Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo

Imprimir

XML

PubMed Links

Buscar en Google