Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
AI-Based Automated Lipomatous Tumor Segmentation in MR Images: Ensemble Solution to Heterogeneous Data.
Liu, Chih-Chieh; Abdelhafez, Yasser G; Yap, S Paran; Acquafredda, Francesco; Schirò, Silvia; Wong, Andrew L; Sarohia, Dani; Bateni, Cyrus; Darrow, Morgan A; Guindani, Michele; Lee, Sonia; Zhang, Michelle; Moawad, Ahmed W; Ng, Quinn Kwan-Tai; Shere, Layla; Elsayes, Khaled M; Maroldi, Roberto; Link, Thomas M; Nardo, Lorenzo; Qi, Jinyi.
Afiliación
  • Liu CC; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
  • Abdelhafez YG; Department of Radiology, UC Davis Health, Sacramento, CA, USA.
  • Yap SP; Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine Department, South Egypt Cancer Institute, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.
  • Acquafredda F; Department of Radiology, UC Davis Health, Sacramento, CA, USA.
  • Schirò S; Department of Radiology ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy.
  • Wong AL; Section of Radiology, Department of Medicine and Surgery (DiMeC), University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
  • Sarohia D; Department of Radiology, UC Davis Health, Sacramento, CA, USA.
  • Bateni C; Department of Radiology, UC Davis Health, Sacramento, CA, USA.
  • Darrow MA; Department of Radiology, UC Davis Health, Sacramento, CA, USA.
  • Guindani M; Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
  • Lee S; Department of Biostatistics, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Zhang M; Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.
  • Moawad AW; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Canada.
  • Ng QK; Department of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Shere L; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Mercy Catholic Medical Center, Darby, PA, USA.
  • Elsayes KM; Department of Radiology, UC Davis Health, Sacramento, CA, USA.
  • Maroldi R; Department of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Link TM; Department of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Nardo L; Department of Radiology ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy.
  • Qi J; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
J Digit Imaging ; 36(3): 1049-1059, 2023 06.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36854923
ABSTRACT
Deep learning (DL) has been proposed to automate image segmentation and provide accuracy, consistency, and efficiency. Accurate segmentation of lipomatous tumors (LTs) is critical for correct tumor radiomics analysis and localization. The major challenge of this task is data heterogeneity, including tumor morphological characteristics and multicenter scanning protocols. To mitigate the issue, we aimed to develop a DL-based Super Learner (SL) ensemble framework with different data correction and normalization methods. Pathologically proven LTs on pre-operative T1-weighted/proton-density MR images of 185 patients were manually segmented. The LTs were categorized by tumor locations as distal upper limb (DUL), distal lower limb (DLL), proximal upper limb (PUL), proximal lower limb (PLL), or Trunk (T) and grouped by 80%/9%/11% for training, validation and testing. Six configurations of correction/normalization were applied to data for fivefold-cross-validation trainings, resulting in 30 base learners (BLs). A SL was obtained from the BLs by optimizing SL weights. The performance was evaluated by dice-similarity-coefficient (DSC), sensitivity, specificity, and Hausdorff distance (HD95). For predictions of the BLs, the average DSC, sensitivity, and specificity from the testing data were 0.72 [Formula see text] 0.16, 0.73 [Formula see text] 0.168, and 0.99 [Formula see text] 0.012, respectively, while for SL predictions were 0.80 [Formula see text] 0.184, 0.78 [Formula see text] 0.193, and 1.00 [Formula see text] 0.010. The average HD95 of the BLs were 11.5 (DUL), 23.2 (DLL), 25.9 (PUL), 32.1 (PLL), and 47.9 (T) mm, whereas of SL were 1.7, 8.4, 15.9, 2.2, and 36.6 mm, respectively. The proposed method could improve the segmentation accuracy and mitigate the performance instability and data heterogeneity aiding the differential diagnosis of LTs in real clinical situations.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador / Imagen por Resonancia Magnética Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Digit Imaging Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / INFORMATICA MEDICA / RADIOLOGIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador / Imagen por Resonancia Magnética Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Digit Imaging Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / INFORMATICA MEDICA / RADIOLOGIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos