Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A survey of ASER members on artificial intelligence in emergency radiology: trends, perceptions, and expectations.
Agrawal, Anjali; Khatri, Garvit D; Khurana, Bharti; Sodickson, Aaron D; Liang, Yuanyuan; Dreizin, David.
Afiliación
  • Agrawal A; New Delhi operations, Teleradiology Solutions, Delhi, India.
  • Khatri GD; Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Khurana B; Emergency Radiology, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Sodickson AD; Emergency Radiology, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Liang Y; Epidemiology & Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Dreizin D; Trauma and Emergency Radiology, Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. daviddreizin@gmail.com.
Emerg Radiol ; 30(3): 267-277, 2023 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36913061
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

There is a growing body of diagnostic performance studies for emergency radiology-related artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML) tools; however, little is known about user preferences, concerns, experiences, expectations, and the degree of penetration of AI tools in emergency radiology. Our aim is to conduct a survey of the current trends, perceptions, and expectations regarding AI among American Society of Emergency Radiology (ASER) members.

METHODS:

An anonymous and voluntary online survey questionnaire was e-mailed to all ASER members, followed by two reminder e-mails. A descriptive analysis of the data was conducted, and results summarized.

RESULTS:

A total of 113 members responded (response rate 12%). The majority were attending radiologists (90%) with greater than 10 years' experience (80%) and from an academic practice (65%). Most (55%) reported use of commercial AI CAD tools in their practice. Workflow prioritization based on pathology detection, injury or disease severity grading and classification, quantitative visualization, and auto-population of structured reports were identified as high-value tasks. Respondents overwhelmingly indicated a need for explainable and verifiable tools (87%) and the need for transparency in the development process (80%). Most respondents did not feel that AI would reduce the need for emergency radiologists in the next two decades (72%) or diminish interest in fellowship programs (58%). Negative perceptions pertained to potential for automation bias (23%), over-diagnosis (16%), poor generalizability (15%), negative impact on training (11%), and impediments to workflow (10%).

CONCLUSION:

ASER member respondents are in general optimistic about the impact of AI in the practice of emergency radiology and its impact on the popularity of emergency radiology as a subspecialty. The majority expect to see transparent and explainable AI models with the radiologist as the decision-maker.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Radiología / Inteligencia Artificial Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Emerg Radiol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: India

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Radiología / Inteligencia Artificial Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Emerg Radiol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: India