Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Optimal endoscopic localization of colorectal neoplasms: a comparison of rural versus urban documentation practices.
El-Kefraoui, Charbel; Johnson, Garrett; Singh, Harminder; Helewa, Ramzi M.
Afiliación
  • El-Kefraoui C; Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
  • Johnson G; Department of Surgery, Section of General Surgery, University of Manitoba, St. Boniface General Hospital, Z3023-409 Tache Avenue, Winnipeg, MB, R2H 2A6, Canada.
  • Singh H; Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
  • Helewa RM; Department of Surgery, Section of General Surgery, University of Manitoba, St. Boniface General Hospital, Z3023-409 Tache Avenue, Winnipeg, MB, R2H 2A6, Canada.
World J Surg Oncol ; 21(1): 115, 2023 Mar 29.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36978191
BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy is the gold standard for diagnosing colorectal neoplasms. However, colonoscopy is often repeated preoperatively due to non-standard documentation and inconsistent practices by index endoscopists. Repeat endoscopies result in treatment delays and can increase risks of complications. National consensus recommendations were recently developed for optimal endoscopic colorectal lesion localization. We aimed to assess baseline colonoscopy practice differences from the new recommendations with a focus on geographical variability in report quality between urban and rural referral sites. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent elective surgery for colorectal neoplasms at a single institution in Winnipeg between 2007-2020. We compared endoscopy report quality to the national recommendations with charts stratified by endoscopy location. Our primary outcomes were overall report documentation completeness and use of recommended practices. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-four patients were included (97 rural, 97 urban). The mean overall compliance with the recommendations for urban endoscopies was marginally better compared to rural endoscopies (50% vs. 48%, p = 0.04). Sixty-eight percent of the reports complied with tattoo indications (72% urban; 63% rural, p = 0.16). On average, reports included 29% of recommended tattoo information (30% urban; 28% rural, p = 0.25) and demonstrated 74% appropriate tattoo technique (70% urban; 81% rural, p = 0.10). Twenty-one percent of reports included photographs of lesions in accordance with the national recommendations (28% urban; 13% rural, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopists frequently omit recommended practices for optimal colorectal lesion localization. Rural reports miss more recommended information compared to urban reports. Future research is needed to facilitate province-wide high-quality endoscopy reporting for patients regardless of endoscopy location.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Colorrectales Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: World J Surg Oncol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Colorrectales Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: World J Surg Oncol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá