Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Implementation and evaluation of STOPP/START criteria to address polypharmacy in older adults in an inpatient psychiatric setting.
Burke, Andrea; O'Driscoll, Michelle; Crowley, Erin K; Dhubhlaing, Ciara Ni.
Afiliación
  • Burke A; Pharmacy Department, St. Patrick's Mental Health Services, Dublin, Ireland.
  • O'Driscoll M; Pharmaceutical Care Research Group, School of Pharmacy, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
  • Crowley EK; Pharmaceutical Care Research Group, School of Pharmacy, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
  • Dhubhlaing CN; Pharmaceutical Care Research Group, School of Pharmacy, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm ; 9: 100245, 2023 Mar.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37065779
ABSTRACT

Background:

There is a scarcity of research in applying the Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions/Screening Tool to Alert to Right Treatment (STOPP/START) criteria to older adults admitted to a psychiatric hospital.

Objectives:

The primary aim of this study was to determine the extent of polypharmacy in older adults admitted to a psychiatric hospital and to assess the number of STOPP/START triggers detected and recommended by pharmacists. Secondary objectives include evaluating if the STOPP/START criteria is a useful tool to improve prescribing in this setting by assessing the implementation rates of STOPP/START triggers.

Methods:

This was a prospective, longitudinal study in a psychiatry inpatient setting. Data were collected over a 7-week period. Explicit informed consent was obtained from participants. Medication reconciliation was completed and participants' medications were reviewed using STOPP/START criteria. The number of STOPP/START triggers detected, recommended and implemented was recorded.

Results:

Sixty-two patients were included in the study. Ninety-four percent were prescribed ≥5 medications and 55% were prescribed ≥10 medications on admission. The mean number of medications prescribed per patient increased from 10 on admission to 12 at follow-up. Of 174 Potential Inappropriate Medications (PIMs) detected, 41% were recommended for review and, of these only 31% were implemented. 27% of the 77 Potential Prescribing Omissions (PPOs) detected were recommended for review and only 23% of those were implemented.

Conclusion:

STOPP/START did not reduce the prevalence of polypharmacy in this setting. The implementation rates observed in this study were much lower than those observed in non-psychiatric settings.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Irlanda

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Irlanda