Comparing outcomes of central ingrowth peg vs. noningrowth pegged glenoid components during revision to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Simister, Samuel K; Sato, Eleanor H; Fleming, Kory; Chalmers, Peter N; Tashjian, Robert Z

Simister, Samuel K; Sato, Eleanor H; Fleming, Kory; Chalmers, Peter N; Tashjian, Robert Z.

Afiliación

Simister SK; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Sato EH; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Fleming K; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Chalmers PN; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Tashjian RZ; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

JSES Int ; 7(4): 623-627, 2023 Jul.

Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37426913

Palabras clave

Central ingrowth glenoid; Noningrowth pegged glenoid; Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty; Revision shoulder arthroplasty; Revisions reverse total shoulder arthroplasty; Shoulder arthroplasty; Total shoulder arthroplasty

Texto completo

Imprimir

XML

PubMed Links

Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: JSES Int Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo

Imprimir

XML

PubMed Links

Buscar en Google