The Impact of COVID-19 Infection Control Measures on End-Stage Renal Disease Patients in a Community Hemodialysis Setting.

INTRODUCTION: Several non-pharmaceutical infection control measures have been implemented at community-based hemodialysis centers to reduce the risk of Coronavirus Disease of 2019 (COVID-19) transmission, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. However, there have been concerns that such measures may disrupt the routine and timely care required by patients, with adverse effects on their health outcomes. This cross-sectional study aims to determine the unintended consequences of COVID-19 infection control measures on hemodialysis patients. METHODS:  Electronic medical records were extracted from patients enrolled in community-based hemodialysis centers in Singapore. A baseline group prior of patients consisted of those enrolled in 2017, which was three years prior to the SARS-CoV-2-related pandemic (n = 548). This was compared with the study group of patients enrolled in 2019 (n = 426), just before the COVID-19 pandemic started. Medical records for these two groups were extracted from January to July 2018 for the baseline group and from January to July 2020, respectively. Three regression models were built to study dialysis adherence, kidney disease biomarkers, and hospitalization episodes. RESULTS:  There was no statistically significant difference in hospitalization and mortality outcomes, adherence to dialysis management, laboratory results for dialysis-related clearance, and anemia outcomes. There was a higher proportion of patients hospitalized for vascular access-related reasons in the study group as compared to the baseline group (OR 1.6, 95% CI: 1.10 to 2.29, P = 0.014). Patients in the study group had albumin levels 2.13% higher (95% CI: 0.88 to 3.39, P < 0.001) and alkaline phosphatase levels 7.3% lower (95% CI: 1.17 to 13.02, P = 0.020) than those in the baseline group. CONCLUSIONS:  From this community-based hemodialysis study in Singapore, it was shown that the COVID-19 pandemic did not disrupt regular healthcare services for these patients. With strategies instituted for a coordinated health delivery workflow, ensuring sufficient capacity in the various healthcare delivery sites and overall pandemic preparedness, the patient clinical outcomes measures continued to be met with no adverse consequences noted. Some improvements in dialysis-related laboratory values and quality of care targets may be due to more stringent measures instituted to protect these vulnerable patients in the community.