Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of high-risk prenatal screening results for 22q11.2 deletion syndrome on obstetric and neonatal management: Secondary analysis from the SMART study.
Martin, Kimberly; Norton, Mary E; MacPherson, Cora; Demko, Zachary; Egbert, Melissa; Haeri, Sina; Malone, Fergal; Wapner, Ronald J; Roman, Ashley S; Khalil, Asma; Faro, Revital; Madankumar, Rajeevi; Strong, Noel; Silver, Robert; Vohra, Nidhi; Hyett, Jon; Kao, Charlly; Hakonarson, Hakon; Jacobson, Bo; Dar, Pe'er.
Afiliación
  • Martin K; Natera Inc., Austin, Texas, USA.
  • Norton ME; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
  • MacPherson C; The Biostatistics Center, George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
  • Demko Z; Natera Inc., Austin, Texas, USA.
  • Egbert M; Natera Inc., Austin, Texas, USA.
  • Haeri S; Ouma Health, Park City, Utah, USA.
  • Malone F; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rotunda Hospital, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Wapner RJ; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
  • Roman AS; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York University Langone, New York, New York, USA.
  • Khalil A; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. George's Hospital, University of London, London, UK.
  • Faro R; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Peter's University Hospital, New Brunswick, New Jersy, USA.
  • Madankumar R; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New Hyde Park, New York, USA.
  • Strong N; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
  • Silver R; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
  • Vohra N; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, North Shore University Hospital, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Manhasset, New York, USA.
  • Hyett J; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Kao C; Center for Applied Genomics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Hakonarson H; Center for Applied Genomics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Jacobson B; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Dar P; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Prenat Diagn ; 43(13): 1574-1580, 2023 12.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38066724
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

One goal of prenatal genetic screening is to optimize perinatal care and improve infant outcomes. We sought to determine whether high-risk cfDNA screening for 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS) affected prenatal or neonatal management.

METHODS:

This was a secondary analysis from the SMART study. Patients with high-risk cfDNA results for 22q11.2DS were compared with the low-risk cohort for pregnancy characteristics and obstetrical management. To assess differences in neonatal care, we compared high-risk neonates without prenatal genetic confirmation with a 11 matched low-risk cohort.

RESULTS:

Of 18,020 eligible participants enrolled between 2015 and 2019, 38 (0.21%) were high-risk and 17,982 (99.79%) were low-risk for 22q11.2DS by cfDNA screening. High-risk participants had more prenatal diagnostic testing (55.3%; 21/38 vs. 2.0%; 352/17,982, p < 0.001) and fetal echocardiography (76.9%; 10/13 vs. 19.6%; 10/51, p < 0.001). High-risk newborns without prenatal diagnostic testing had higher rates of neonatal genetic testing (46.2%; 6/13 vs. 0%; 0/51, P < 0.001), echocardiography (30.8%; 4/13 vs. 4.0%; 2/50, p = 0.013), evaluation of calcium levels (46.2%; 6/13 vs. 4.1%; 2/49, P < 0.001) and lymphocyte count (53.8%; 7/13 vs. 15.7%; 8/51, p = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS:

High-risk screening results for 22q11.2DS were associated with higher rates of prenatal and neonatal diagnostic genetic testing and other 22q11.2DS-specific evaluations. However, these interventions were not universally performed, and >50% of high-risk infants were discharged without genetic testing, representing possible missed opportunities to improve outcomes for affected individuals.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Síndrome de DiGeorge / Ácidos Nucleicos Libres de Células Límite: Female / Humans / Infant / Newborn / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Prenat Diagn Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Síndrome de DiGeorge / Ácidos Nucleicos Libres de Células Límite: Female / Humans / Infant / Newborn / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Prenat Diagn Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos