Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Why Do Only Some Cohort Studies Find Health Benefits From Low-Volume Alcohol Use? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Study Characteristics That May Bias Mortality Risk Estimates.
Stockwell, Tim; Zhao, Jinhui; Clay, James; Levesque, Christine; Sanger, Nitika; Sherk, Adam; Naimi, Timothy.
Afiliación
  • Stockwell T; Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Zhao J; Psychology Department, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Clay J; Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Levesque C; Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Sanger N; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
  • Sherk A; Canadian Centre on Substance Use and Addiction, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • Naimi T; Canadian Centre on Substance Use and Addiction, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
J Stud Alcohol Drugs ; 85(4): 441-452, 2024 Jul.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38289182
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Assumptions about alcohol's health benefits profoundly influence global disease burden estimates and drinking guidelines. Using theory and evidence, we identify and test study characteristics that may bias estimates of all-cause mortality risk associated with low-volume drinking.

METHOD:

We identified 107 longitudinal studies by systematic review with 724 estimates of the association between alcohol consumption and all-cause mortality for 4,838,825 participants with 425,564 recorded deaths. "Higher-quality" studies had a mean cohort age of 55 years or younger, followed up beyond 55 years, and excluded former and occasional drinkers from abstainer reference groups. "Low-volume" alcohol use was defined as between one drink per week (>1.30 g ethanol/day) and two drinks per day (<25 g ethanol/ day). Mixed linear regression was used to model relative risks (RRs) of mortality for subgroups of higher- versus lower-quality studies.

RESULTS:

As predicted, studies with younger cohorts and separating former and occasional drinkers from abstainers estimated similar mortality risk for low-volume drinkers (RR = 0.98, 95% CI [0.87, 1.11]) as abstainers. Studies not meeting these quality criteria estimated significantly lower risk for low-volume drinkers (RR = 0.84, [0.79, 0.89]). In exploratory analyses, studies controlling for smoking and/or socioeconomic status had significantly reduced mortality risks for low-volume drinkers. However, mean RR estimates for low-volume drinkers in nonsmoking cohorts were above 1.0 (RR = 1.16, [0.91, 1.41]).

CONCLUSIONS:

Studies with lifetime selection biases may create misleading positive health associations. These biases pervade the field of alcohol epidemiology and can confuse communications about health risks. Future research should investigate whether smoking status mediates, moderates, or confounds alcohol-mortality risk relationships.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Stud Alcohol Drugs Asunto de la revista: TRANSTORNOS RELACIONADOS COM SUBSTANCIAS Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Stud Alcohol Drugs Asunto de la revista: TRANSTORNOS RELACIONADOS COM SUBSTANCIAS Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá