Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Can screen-time help? An analysis of usage of patient engagement technology following colorectal surgery.
Irfan, Ahmer; Smith, Burke; Wood, Lauren; Hollis, Robert H; Wallace, Eric; Rubyan, Michael; Reddy, Sushanth; Chu, Daniel I.
Afiliación
  • Irfan A; Department of General Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. Electronic address: ahmer.irfan@uhn.ca.
  • Smith B; Department of General Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
  • Wood L; Department of General Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
  • Hollis RH; Department of General Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
  • Wallace E; Department of General Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
  • Rubyan M; School of Public Health, University of Michigan, MI, USA.
  • Reddy S; Department of General Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
  • Chu DI; Department of General Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Am J Surg ; 233: 78-83, 2024 Jul.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38383163
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Patient engagement technologies (PETs) guide patients through the perioperative period. We aimed to investigate the levels of patient engagement with PETs through the peri-operative period and its impact on clinical outcomes.

METHODS:

Retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery from 2018 to 2022. Outcomes were length of stay, readmissions, and complications within 30 days of index hospitalization.

RESULTS:

359 (89.1%) patients activated the PET. Patients completed a median of 7 surveys, 2 in-hospital health-checks, and 1 post-discharge health-check. Median LOS was 3 days, 57 (14.1%) patients were readmitted, and 56 (13.9%) had a complication. Patients who completed no surveys had longer LOS than those who completed 2 or more. Patients who were readmitted and had post-operative complications completed significantly fewer surveys and post-discharge health-checks. Completion of surveys in more phases was associated with shorter LOS and lower readmission rates. Completion of more post-discharge health-checks was associated with lower complication rate.

CONCLUSIONS:

The use of PETs improves patient outcomes and experiences in the perioperative period. Patients who engage more frequently with PETs have shorter LOS with lower readmission and post-operative complication rates.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Participación del Paciente / Readmisión del Paciente / Complicaciones Posoperatorias / Tiempo de Internación Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Am J Surg Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Participación del Paciente / Readmisión del Paciente / Complicaciones Posoperatorias / Tiempo de Internación Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Am J Surg Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article