Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Colonoscopic cancer detection rate: a new performance measure - is it FIT for purpose?
Bashir, Khalid; Beintaris, Iosif; Sharp, Linda; Newton, Julia; Elliott, Katherine; Rees, Jon; Rogers, Peter; Rutter, Matt.
Afiliación
  • Bashir K; University Hospital of North Tees, Stockton-on-Tees, UK.
  • Beintaris I; Gastroenterology, North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust, Stockton-on-Tees, UK.
  • Sharp L; Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
  • Newton J; Academic Health Science Network for the North East and North Cumbria, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
  • Elliott K; Northern Cancer Alliance and GP Spring Terrace North Shields, North Shields, UK.
  • Rees J; School of Psychology Faculty of Health Sciences and Wellbeing, University of Sunderland, Sunderland, UK.
  • Rogers P; Weblogik.co.uk, Ipswich, UK.
  • Rutter M; Gastroenterology, North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust, Stockton-on-Tees, UK.
Frontline Gastroenterol ; 15(3): 198-202, 2024 May.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38668994
ABSTRACT

Introduction:

Gastrointestinal symptoms correlate poorly with cancer diagnosis. A faecal immunochemical test (FIT) result of ≥10 µg has high sensitivity and negative predictive value for colorectal cancer (CRC) detection. An FIT-based diagnostic pathway may lead to more effective resource utilisation. We aimed to use National Endoscopy Database (NED) data to create a new colonoscopy performance measure, cancer detection rate (CDR) to assess the appropriate identification of target populations for colonoscopy; then to use CDR to assess the impact of implementing an FIT-based referral pathway locally.

Methods:

NED data were analysed to compare local diagnostic colonoscopic CDR in 2019 (prepathway revision) and 2021 (postpathway revision), benchmarked against overall national CDR for the same time frames.

Results:

1, 123, 624 NED diagnostic colonoscopies were analysed. Locally, there was a significant increase in CDR between 2019 and 2021, from 3.01% (2.45%-3.47%) to 4.32% (3.69%-4.95%), p=0.003. The CDR increase was due to both a 10% increase in the number of CRCs detected and a 25% reduction in the number of diagnostic colonoscopies performed. Nationally, there was a smaller, but significant, increase in CDR from 2.02% (1.99%-2.07%) to 2.33% (2.29%-2.37%), p<0.001. The rate of increase in CDR% between 2019 and 2021 was significantly different locally compared with nationally.

Conclusion:

Our study indicates that the introduction of a robustly vetted FIT-based algorithm to determine whether diagnostic colonoscopy is required, is effective in increasing the colonoscopic CDR. Moreover, CDR appears to be a meaningful performance metric that can be automatically calculated through NED, enabling monitoring of the quality of referral and vetting pathways.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Frontline Gastroenterol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Frontline Gastroenterol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido