Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
CDK4/6 Inhibitor Efficacy in ESR1-Mutant Metastatic Breast Cancer.
Lloyd, Maxwell R; Brett, Jamie O; Carmeli, Ariel; Weipert, Caroline M; Zhang, Nicole; Yu, Junhua; Bucheit, Leslie; Medford, Arielle J; Wagle, Nikhil; Bardia, Aditya; Wander, Seth A.
Afiliación
  • Lloyd MR; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston.
  • Brett JO; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston.
  • Carmeli A; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston.
  • Weipert CM; The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA.
  • Zhang N; Count Me In: Patient-Partnered Research, Cambridge, MA.
  • Yu J; Guardant Health, Palo Alto, CA.
  • Bucheit L; Guardant Health, Palo Alto, CA.
  • Medford AJ; Guardant Health, Palo Alto, CA.
  • Wagle N; Guardant Health, Palo Alto, CA.
  • Bardia A; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston.
  • Wander SA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston.
NEJM Evid ; 3(5): EVIDoa2300231, 2024 May.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38815172
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer, ESR1 mutations (ESR1m) are a common mechanism of acquired resistance to aromatase inhibitors (ArIh). However, the impact ESR1 alterations have on CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) sensitivity has not been established. Analyses of CDK4/6i trials suggest that the endocrine therapy partner and specific ESR1 allele may affect susceptibility. We analyzed a real-world data set to investigate CDK4/6i efficacy in ESR1m metastatic breast cancer and associated clinical factors.

METHODS:

ESR1m were identified by analysis of circulating-tumor deoxyribonucleic acid. The GuardantINFORM database contains genomic information from tumors linked with claims data. Patients who started a CDK4/6i within 30 days of sequencing were categorized as having ESR1m or non-ESR1-mutant (non-ESR1m) breast cancer. Data were analyzed to determine the real-world time-to-next-treatment, defined as the start of a breast cancer treatment to initiation of the subsequent treatment.

RESULTS:

One hundred forty-five patients with ESR1m and 612 with non-ESR1m metastatic breast cancer were analyzed. ESR1m and non-ESR1m tumors had similar real-world time-to-next-treatment on CDK4/6i regimens (hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.82 to 1.23). Duration on therapy in the first-line and second-line plus treatment settings were comparable regardless of ESR1 status. We stratified treatment duration by concurrent endocrine therapy, and patients with ESR1m had worse outcomes on ArIh but comparable real-world time-to-next-treatment on fulvestrant.

CONCLUSIONS:

These data suggest ESR1 variants are not associated with pan-CDK4/6i resistance and are consistent with the hypothesis that CDK4/6 blockade combined with a selective estrogen receptor degrader is potentially an effective option for ESR1m metastatic breast cancer.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Mama / Receptor alfa de Estrógeno / Quinasa 4 Dependiente de la Ciclina / Quinasa 6 Dependiente de la Ciclina / Mutación Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: NEJM Evid Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Mama / Receptor alfa de Estrógeno / Quinasa 4 Dependiente de la Ciclina / Quinasa 6 Dependiente de la Ciclina / Mutación Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: NEJM Evid Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article