Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
SARS-CoV-2 delta variant in African lions (Panthera leo) and humans at Utah's Hogle Zoo, USA, 2021-22.
Oltjen, Heather; Crook, Erika; Lanier, William A; Rettler, Hannah; Oakeson, Kelly F; Young, Erin L; Torchetti, Mia; Van Wettere, Arnaud J.
Afiliación
  • Oltjen H; Utah Department of Health and Human Services, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
  • Crook E; Utah's Hogle Zoo, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
  • Lanier WA; Utah Department of Health and Human Services, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
  • Rettler H; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Office of Readiness and Response, Division of State and Local Readiness, Career Epidemiology Field Officer Program, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Oakeson KF; US Public Health Service, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
  • Young EL; Utah Department of Health and Human Services, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
  • Torchetti M; Utah Public Health Laboratory, Utah Department of Health and Human Services, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
  • Van Wettere AJ; Utah Public Health Laboratory, Utah Department of Health and Human Services, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38825749
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

We conducted a One Health investigation to assess the source and transmission dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 infection in African lions (Panthera leo) at Utah's Hogle Zoo in Salt Lake City from October 2021 to February 2022. METHODS AND

RESULTS:

Following observation of respiratory illness in the lions, zoo staff collected pooled faecal samples and individual nasal swabs from four lions. All specimens tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The resulting investigation included lion observation; RT-PCR testing of lion faeces every 1-7 days; RT-PCR testing of lion respiratory specimens every 2-3 weeks; staff interviews and RT-PCR testing; whole-genome sequencing of viruses from lions and staff; and comparison with existing SARS-CoV-2 human community surveillance sequences. In addition to all five lions, three staff displayed respiratory symptoms. All lions recovered and no hospitalizations or deaths were reported among staff. Three staff reported close contact with the lions in the 10 days before lion illness onset, one of whom developed symptoms and tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 on days 3 and 4, respectively, after lion illness onset. The other two did not report symptoms or test positive. Two staff who did not have close contact with the lions were symptomatic and tested positive on days 5 and 8, respectively, after lion illness onset. We detected SARS-CoV-2 RNA in lion faeces for 33 days and in lion respiratory specimens for 14 weeks after illness onset. The viruses from lions were genetically highly related to those from staff and two contemporaneous surveillance specimens from Salt Lake County; all were delta variants (AY.44).

CONCLUSIONS:

We did not determine the sources of these infections, although human-to-lion transmission likely occurred. The observed period of respiratory shedding was longer than in previously documented SARS-CoV-2 infections in large felids, indicating the need to further assess duration and potential implications of shedding.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Zoonoses Public Health Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA VETERINARIA / SAUDE PUBLICA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Zoonoses Public Health Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA VETERINARIA / SAUDE PUBLICA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos