Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of inadequate bowel cleansing in sigmoidoscopy screening.
Randel, Kristin Ranheim; Schult, Anna Lisa; Botteri, Edoardo; Nawaz, Mobina; Nguyen, Dung Hong; Holme, Øyvind; Bretthauer, Michael; Hoff, Geir; de Lange, Thomas.
Afiliación
  • Randel KR; Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, NIPH, Oslo, Norway.
  • Schult AL; Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, NIPH, Oslo, Norway.
  • Botteri E; Department of Medicine, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust Bærum, Gjettum, Norway.
  • Nawaz M; Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, NIPH, Oslo, Norway.
  • Nguyen DH; Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, NIPH, Oslo, Norway.
  • Holme Ø; Department of Medicine, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust Bærum, Gjettum, Norway.
  • Bretthauer M; Department of Medicine, Østfold Hospital Trust, Kalnes, Norway.
  • Hoff G; Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, NIPH, Oslo, Norway.
  • de Lange T; Department of Medicine, Sørlandet Hospital Trust, Kristiansand, Norway.
Scand J Gastroenterol ; : 1-8, 2024 Jun 08.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38850200
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND STUDY

AIMS:

Long-time follow-up of sigmoidoscopy screening trials has shown reduced incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer (CRC), but inadequate bowel cleansing may hamper efficacy. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of bowel cleansing quality in sigmoidoscopy screening. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

Individuals 50 to 74 years old who had a screening sigmoidoscopy in a population-based Norwegian, randomized trial between 2012 and 2019, were included in this cross-sectional study. The bowel cleansing quality was categorised as excellent, good, partly poor, or poor. The effect of bowel cleansing quality on adenoma detection rate (ADR) and referral to colonoscopy was evaluated by fitting multivariable logistic regression models.

RESULTS:

35,710 individuals were included. The bowel cleansing at sigmoidoscopy was excellent in 20,934 (58.6%) individuals, good in 6580 (18.4%), partly poor in 7097 (19.9%) and poor in 1099 (3.1%). The corresponding ADRs were 17.0%, 16.6%, 14.5%, and 13.0%. Compared to participants with excellent bowel cleansing, those with poor bowel cleansing had an odds ratio for adenoma detection of 0.66 (95% confidence interval 0.55-0.79). We found substantial differences in the assessment of bowel cleansing quality among endoscopists.

CONCLUSIONS:

Inadequate bowel cleansing reduces the efficacy of sigmoidoscopy screening, by lowering ADR. A validated rating scale and improved bowel preparation are needed to make sigmoidoscopy an appropriate screening method.Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01538550).
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Scand J Gastroenterol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Noruega

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Scand J Gastroenterol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Noruega