Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Development and validation of a machine learning-based, point-of-care risk calculator for post-ERCP pancreatitis and prophylaxis selection.
Brenner, Todd; Kuo, Albert; Sperna Weiland, Christina J; Kamal, Ayesha; Elmunzer, B Joseph; Luo, Hui; Buxbaum, James; Gardner, Timothy B; Mok, Shaffer S; Fogel, Evan S; Phillip, Veit; Choi, Jun-Ho; Lua, Guan W; Lin, Ching-Chung; Reddy, D Nageshwar; Lakhtakia, Sundeep; Goenka, Mahesh K; Kochhar, Rakesh; Khashab, Mouen A; van Geenen, Erwin J M; Singh, Vikesh K; Tomasetti, Cristian; Akshintala, Venkata S.
Afiliación
  • Brenner T; Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Kuo A; Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Sperna Weiland CJ; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
  • Kamal A; Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Elmunzer BJ; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
  • Luo H; Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
  • Buxbaum J; Division of Gastroenterology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
  • Gardner TB; Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
  • Mok SS; Moffitt Cancer Center, Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Division of Gastroenterology, Tampa, Florida.
  • Fogel ES; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana.
  • Phillip V; Klinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin II, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, München, Germany.
  • Choi JH; Department of Internal Medicine, Dankook University College of Medicine, Dankook University Hospital, Cheonan, Korea.
  • Lua GW; Ministry of Health, Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia.
  • Lin CC; Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Reddy DN; Department of Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India.
  • Lakhtakia S; Department of Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India.
  • Goenka MK; Department of Gastroenterology, Apollo Gleneagles Hospital, Kolkata, India.
  • Kochhar R; Department of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
  • Khashab MA; Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • van Geenen EJM; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
  • Singh VK; Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Tomasetti C; Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Akshintala VS; Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Electronic address: vakshin1@jhmi.edu.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 2024 Aug 13.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39147103
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

AIMS:

A robust model of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) risk is not currently available. We aimed to develop a machine learning-based tool for PEP risk prediction to aid in clinical decision making related to periprocedural prophylaxis selection and postprocedural monitoring.

METHODS:

Feature selection, model training, and validation were performed using patient-level data from 12 randomized controlled trials. A gradient-boosted machine (GBM) model was trained to estimate PEP risk, and the performance of the resulting model was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) with 5-fold cross-validation. A web-based clinical decision-making tool was created, and a prospective pilot study was performed using data from ERCPs performed at the Johns Hopkins Hospital over a 1-month period.

RESULTS:

A total of 7389 patients were included in the GBM with an 8.6% rate of PEP. The model was trained on 20 PEP risk factors and 5 prophylactic interventions (rectal nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs], aggressive hydration, combined rectal NSAIDs and aggressive hydration, pancreatic duct stenting, and combined rectal NSAIDs and pancreatic duct stenting). The resulting GBM model had an AUC of 0.70 (65% specificity, 65% sensitivity, 95% negative predictive value, and 15% positive predictive value). A total of 135 patients were included in the prospective pilot study, resulting in an AUC of 0.74.

CONCLUSIONS:

This study demonstrates the feasibility and utility of a novel machine learning-based PEP risk estimation tool with high negative predictive value to aid in prophylaxis selection and identify patients at low risk who may not require extended postprocedure monitoring.

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Gastrointest Endosc Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Gastrointest Endosc Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos