Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Long-term prognosis associated with coronary calcification: observations from a registry of 25,253 patients.
Budoff, Matthew J; Shaw, Leslee J; Liu, Sandy T; Weinstein, Steven R; Mosler, Tristen P; Tseng, Philip H; Flores, Ferdinand R; Callister, Tracy Q; Raggi, Paolo; Berman, Daniel S.
Afiliação
  • Budoff MJ; Harbor-UCLA Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Torrance, California 90502, USA. mbudoff@labiomed.org
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 49(18): 1860-70, 2007 May 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17481445
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

The purpose of this study was to develop risk-adjusted multivariable models that include risk factors and coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores measured with electron-beam tomography in asymptomatic patients for the prediction of all-cause mortality.

BACKGROUND:

Several smaller studies have documented the efficacy of CAC testing for assessment of cardiovascular risk. Larger studies with longer follow-up will lend strength to the hypothesis that CAC testing will improve outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and safety of primary prevention efforts.

METHODS:

We used an observational outcome study of a cohort of 25,253 consecutive, asymptomatic individuals referred by their primary physician for CAC scanning to assess cardiovascular risk. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were developed to predict all-cause mortality. Risk-adjusted models incorporated traditional risk factors for coronary disease and CAC scores.

RESULTS:

The frequency of CAC scores was 44%, 14%, 20%, 13%, 6%, and 4% for scores of 0, 1 to 10, 11 to 100, 101 to 400, 401 to 1,000, and >1,000, respectively. During a mean follow-up of 6.8 +/- 3 years, the death rate was 2% (510 deaths). The CAC was an independent predictor of mortality in a multivariable model controlling for age, gender, ethnicity, and cardiac risk factors (model chi-square = 2,017, p < 0.0001). The addition of CAC to traditional risk factors increased the concordance index significantly (0.61 for risk factors vs. 0.81 for the CAC score, p < 0.0001). Risk-adjusted relative risk ratios for CAC were 2.2-, 4.5-, 6.4-, 9.2-, 10.4-, and 12.5-fold for scores of 11 to 100, 101 to 299, 300 to 399, 400 to 699, 700 to 999, and >1,000, respectively (p < 0.0001), when compared with a score of 0. Ten-year survival (after adjustment for risk factors, including age) was 99.4% for a CAC score of 0 and worsened to 87.8% for a score of >1,000 (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS:

This large observational data series shows that CAC provides independent incremental information in addition to traditional risk factors in the prediction of all-cause mortality.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Calcinose / Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais / Vasos Coronários / Cardiomiopatias Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Am Coll Cardiol Ano de publicação: 2007 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Calcinose / Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais / Vasos Coronários / Cardiomiopatias Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Am Coll Cardiol Ano de publicação: 2007 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos