Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Marginal bone loss around implants placed in maxillary native bone or grafted sinuses: a retrospective cohort study.
Galindo-Moreno, P; Fernández-Jiménez, A; Avila-Ortiz, G; Silvestre, F J; Hernández-Cortés, P; Wang, H L.
Afiliação
  • Galindo-Moreno P; Department of Oral Surgery and Implant Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
  • Fernández-Jiménez A; Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Avila-Ortiz G; Private practice, Jaén, Spain.
  • Silvestre FJ; Department of Periodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
  • Hernández-Cortés P; Department of Stomatology, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
  • Wang HL; Orthopedic Surgery Unit, San Cecilio Clinical Hospital, Granada, Spain.
Clin Oral Implants Res ; 25(3): 378-384, 2014 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23421476
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To assess differences in marginal bone loss around implants placed in maxillary pristine bone and implants placed following maxillary sinus augmentation over a period of 3 years after functional loading. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

Two cohorts of subjects (Group 1 Subjects who received sinus augmentation with simultaneous implant placement; Group 2 Subjects who underwent conventional implant placement in posterior maxillary pristine bone) were included in this retrospective study. Radiographic marginal bone loss was measured around one implant per patient on digitized panoramic radiographs that were obtained at the time of prosthesis delivery (baseline) and 12, 24, and 36 months later. The influence of age, gender, smoking habits, history of periodontal disease, and type of prosthetic connection (internal or external) on marginal bone loss was analyzed in function of the type of osseous support (previously grafted or pristine).

RESULTS:

A total of 105 subjects were included in this study. Cumulative radiographic marginal bone loss ranged from 0 mm to 3.9 mm after 36 months of functional loading. There were statistically significant differences in marginal bone loss between implants placed in grafted and pristine bone at the 12-month assessment, but not in the subsequent progression rate. External prosthetic connection, smoking, and history of periodontitis negatively influenced peri-implant bone maintenance, regardless of the type of osseous substrate.

CONCLUSIONS:

Implants placed in sites that received maxillary sinus augmentation exhibited more marginal bone loss than implants placed in pristine bone, although marginal bone loss mainly occurred during the first 12 months after functional loading. Implants with external implant connection were strongly associated with increased marginal bone loss overtime.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Implantes Dentários / Perda do Osso Alveolar / Implantação Dentária Endóssea / Levantamento do Assoalho do Seio Maxilar / Maxila Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Clin Oral Implants Res Assunto da revista: ODONTOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Espanha

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Implantes Dentários / Perda do Osso Alveolar / Implantação Dentária Endóssea / Levantamento do Assoalho do Seio Maxilar / Maxila Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Clin Oral Implants Res Assunto da revista: ODONTOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Espanha