Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cost benefit analysis of mesh reinforcement of stapled left pancreatectomy.
Idrees, Kamran; Edler, Joshua R; Linehan, David C; Strasberg, Steven M; Jacques, David; Hamilton, Nicholas A; Fields, Ryan C; Lambert, Dennis; Kymes, Steven; Hawkins, William G.
Afiliação
  • Idrees K; Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.
  • Edler JR; Center for Economic Evaluation in Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.
  • Linehan DC; Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.
  • Strasberg SM; Siteman Cancer Center, St Louis, MO, USA.
  • Jacques D; Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.
  • Hamilton NA; Siteman Cancer Center, St Louis, MO, USA.
  • Fields RC; Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.
  • Lambert D; Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.
  • Kymes S; Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.
  • Hawkins WG; Siteman Cancer Center, St Louis, MO, USA.
HPB (Oxford) ; 15(11): 893-8, 2013 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23458681
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Pancreatic leak is a morbid complication following left pancreatectomy, which results in prolonged hospitalization, additional diagnostic testing and invasive procedures. The present authors have previously demonstrated that mesh reinforcement of stapled left pancreatectomy results in fewer pancreatic leaks. This study was conducted to investigate whether mesh reinforcement also results in cost benefits for the health care system.

METHODS:

A cost benefit model was developed to estimate net cost savings from the payer's perspective. The model is based on the results of a randomized, single-blinded trial of mesh versus no mesh reinforcement of the pancreatic remnant after left pancreatectomy. A two-way sensitivity analysis was conducted to determine the model's sensitivity to fluctuations in the cost of mesh and the effectiveness of the mesh in reducing clinically significant leaks.

RESULTS:

Average total costs for an episode of care were US$13 337 and US$15 505 for patients who did and did not receive mesh, respectively, which indicates savings of US$2168. Two-way sensitivity analysis showed that, given a probability of 1.9% for developing a clinically significant leak in patients in whom mesh reinforcement was used, the strategy would continue to save costs if mesh were priced at ≤US$1804.

CONCLUSIONS:

Mesh reinforcement decreases clinically significant pancreatic leaks. Despite the additional cost of mesh reinforcement, the use of mesh reinforcement results in overall cost savings for the health care system because of the resultant decrease in the occurrence of clinically significant leaks.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pâncreas / Pancreatectomia / Telas Cirúrgicas / Técnicas de Sutura / Grampeamento Cirúrgico / Fístula Anastomótica Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: HPB (Oxford) Assunto da revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2013 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pâncreas / Pancreatectomia / Telas Cirúrgicas / Técnicas de Sutura / Grampeamento Cirúrgico / Fístula Anastomótica Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: HPB (Oxford) Assunto da revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2013 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos