Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Combined high-field intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging and endoscopy increase extent of resection and progression-free survival for pituitary adenomas.
Sylvester, Peter T; Evans, John A; Zipfel, Gregory J; Chole, Richard A; Uppaluri, Ravindra; Haughey, Bruce H; Getz, Anne E; Silverstein, Julie; Rich, Keith M; Kim, Albert H; Dacey, Ralph G; Chicoine, Michael R.
Afiliação
  • Sylvester PT; Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Ave, Campus Box 8057, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Pituitary ; 18(1): 72-85, 2015 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24599833
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The clinical benefit of combined intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) and endoscopy for transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma resection has not been completely characterized. This study assessed the impact of microscopy, endoscopy, and/or iMRI on progression-free survival, extent of resection status (gross-, near-, and sub-total resection), and operative complications.

METHODS:

Retrospective analyses were performed on 446 transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma surgeries at a single institution between 1998 and 2012. Multivariate analyses were used to control for baseline characteristics, differences during extent of resection status, and progression-free survival analysis.

RESULTS:

Additional surgery was performed after iMRI in 56/156 cases (35.9%), which led to increased extent of resection status in 15/156 cases (9.6%). Multivariate ordinal logistic regression revealed no increase in extent of resection status following iMRI or endoscopy alone; however, combining these modalities increased extent of resection status (odds ratio 2.05, 95% CI 1.21-3.46) compared to conventional transsphenoidal microsurgery. Multivariate Cox regression revealed that reduced extent of resection status shortened progression-free survival for near- versus gross-total resection [hazard ratio (HR) 2.87, 95% CI 1.24-6.65] and sub- versus near-total resection (HR 2.10; 95% CI 1.00-4.40). Complication comparisons between microscopy, endoscopy, and iMRI revealed increased perioperative deaths for endoscopy versus microscopy (4/209 and 0/237, respectively), but this difference was non-significant considering multiple post hoc comparisons (Fisher exact, p = 0.24).

CONCLUSIONS:

Combined use of endoscopy and iMRI increased pituitary adenoma extent of resection status compared to conventional transsphenoidal microsurgery, and increased extent of resection status was associated with longer progression-free survival. Treatment modality combination did not significantly impact complication rate.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Hipofisárias / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Endoscopia Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Pituitary Assunto da revista: ENDOCRINOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Hipofisárias / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Endoscopia Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Pituitary Assunto da revista: ENDOCRINOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos