Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Treatment allocation in hepatocellular carcinoma: Assessment of the BCLC algorithm.
Richani, Mandy; Kolly, Philippe; Knoepfli, Marina; Herrmann, Evelyn; Zweifel, Martin; von Tengg-Kobligk, Hendrik; Candinas, Daniel; Dufour, Jean-François.
Afiliação
  • Richani M; Hepatology, Department of Clinical Research, University of Bern. Switzerland.
  • Kolly P; Hepatology, Department of Clinical Research, University of Bern. Switzerland.
  • Knoepfli M; University Clinic for Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, University of Bern. Switzerland.
  • Herrmann E; University Clinic for Radio-oncology, Inselspital, University of Bern. Switzerland.
  • Zweifel M; Department of Oncology, Inselspital, University of Bern. Switzerland.
  • von Tengg-Kobligk H; University Institute for Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology, Inselspital, University of Bern. Switzerland.
  • Candinas D; University Clinic for Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, University of Bern. Switzerland.
  • Dufour JF; Hepatology, Department of Clinical Research, University of Bern. Switzerland.
Ann Hepatol ; 15(1): 82-90, 2016.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26626644
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

AIMS:

The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system is the algorithm most widely used to manage patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to investigate the extent to which the BCLC recommendations effectively guide clinical practice and assess the reasons for any deviation from the recommendations. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

The first-line treatments assigned to patients included in the prospective Bern HCC cohort were analyzed.

RESULTS:

Among 223 patients included in the cohort, 116 were not treated according to the BCLC algorithm. Eighty percent of the patients in BCLC stage 0 (very early HCC) and 60% of the patients in BCLC stage A (early HCC) received recommended curative treatment. Only 29% of the BCLC stage B patients (intermediate HCC) and 33% of the BCLC stage C patients (advanced HCC) were treated according to the algorithm. Eighty-nine percent of the BCLC stage D patients (terminal HCC) were treated with best supportive care, as recommended. In 98 patients (44%) the performance status was disregarded in the stage assignment.

CONCLUSION:

The management of HCC in clinical practice frequently deviates from the BCLC recommendations. Most of the curative therapy options, which have well-defined selection criteria, were allocated according to the recommendations, while the majority of the palliative therapy options were assigned to patients with tumor stages not aligned with the recommendations. The only parameter which is subjective in the algorithm, the performance status, is also the least respected.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Algoritmos / Padrões de Prática Médica / Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão / Carcinoma Hepatocelular / Seleção de Pacientes / Atenção à Saúde / Neoplasias Hepáticas / Estadiamento de Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Ann Hepatol Assunto da revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Algoritmos / Padrões de Prática Médica / Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão / Carcinoma Hepatocelular / Seleção de Pacientes / Atenção à Saúde / Neoplasias Hepáticas / Estadiamento de Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Ann Hepatol Assunto da revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article