Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Six Strategies to Treat Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection.
Lapointe-Shaw, Lauren; Tran, Kim L; Coyte, Peter C; Hancock-Howard, Rebecca L; Powis, Jeff; Poutanen, Susan M; Hota, Susy.
Afiliação
  • Lapointe-Shaw L; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
  • Tran KL; Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
  • Coyte PC; Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
  • Hancock-Howard RL; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
  • Powis J; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
  • Poutanen SM; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
  • Hota S; Department of Medicine, Toronto East General Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
PLoS One ; 11(2): e0149521, 2016.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26901316
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To assess the cost-effectiveness of six treatment strategies for patients diagnosed with recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in Canada 1. oral metronidazole; 2. oral vancomycin; 3.oral fidaxomicin; 4. fecal transplantation by enema; 5. fecal transplantation by nasogastric tube; and 6. fecal transplantation by colonoscopy. PERSPECTIVE Public insurer for all hospital and physician services.

SETTING:

Ontario, Canada.

METHODS:

A decision analytic model was used to model costs and lifetime health effects of each strategy for a typical patient experiencing up to three recurrences, over 18 weeks. Recurrence data and utilities were obtained from published sources. Cost data was obtained from published sources and hospitals in Toronto, Canada. The willingness-to-pay threshold was $50,000/QALY gained.

RESULTS:

Fecal transplantation by colonoscopy dominated all other strategies in the base case, as it was less costly and more effective than all alternatives. After accounting for uncertainty in all model parameters, there was an 87% probability that fecal transplantation by colonoscopy was the most beneficial strategy. If colonoscopy was not available, fecal transplantation by enema was cost-effective at $1,708 per QALY gained, compared to metronidazole. In addition, fecal transplantation by enema was the preferred strategy if the probability of recurrence following this strategy was below 8.7%. If fecal transplantation by any means was unavailable, fidaxomicin was cost-effective at an additional cost of $25,968 per QALY gained, compared to metronidazole.

CONCLUSION:

Fecal transplantation by colonoscopy (or enema, if colonoscopy is unavailable) is cost-effective for treating recurrent CDI in Canada. Where fecal transplantation is not available, fidaxomicin is also cost-effective.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa / Clostridioides difficile / Transplante de Microbiota Fecal / Antibacterianos Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Assunto da revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa / Clostridioides difficile / Transplante de Microbiota Fecal / Antibacterianos Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Assunto da revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá