Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Presurgical Psychological Assessments as Correlates of Effectiveness of Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Pain Reduction.
Blackburn, David R; Romers, Cinamon C; Copeland, Laurel A; Lynch, Windrik; Nguyen, David D; Zeber, John E; Hoffman, Michael R.
Afiliação
  • Blackburn DR; Department of Psychiatry, Baylor Scott & White Health, Temple, TX, USA.
  • Romers CC; Department of Psychiatry, Baylor Scott & White Health, Temple, TX, USA.
  • Copeland LA; Center for Applied Health Research, Central Texas Veterans Health Care System, Baylor Scott & White Health, Temple, TX, USA.
  • Lynch W; Texas A&M Health Science Center, College of Medicine, Bryan, TX, USA.
  • Nguyen DD; Department of Psychiatry, UT Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
  • Zeber JE; Department of Anesthesiology, Baylor Scott & White Health, Temple, TX, USA.
  • Hoffman MR; Department of Anesthesiology, Texas A&M College of Medicine and Health Science Center, Temple, TX, USA.
Neuromodulation ; 19(4): 422-8, 2016 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27028312
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Spinal Cord Stimulator (SCS) is a surgically implanted device for patients with certain types of chronic pain. While some studies show the value of psychological screening of potential SCS candidates, no consensus exists. This single-site study analyzed the association of SCS success with psychological assessments (e.g., Millon Behavioral Medicine Diagnostic), beliefs regarding SCS efficacy, self-reported pain and quality of life (QOL) among patients approved for SCS.

METHODS:

Potential SCS candidates (N = 200) were contacted 3-7 years after initial psychological and medical clearance for SCS; 59 consented to a structured telephone interview. Thirty-four of the 59 had received a SCS; 25 had not received a SCS. Of the 34 that had received a SCS, 22 were approved by routine psychological evaluation while 12 went through in-depth psychological testing.

RESULTS:

The majority of respondents (62%) reported effective pain reduction, and 64% of SCS recipients reported improved QOL. Younger patients reported higher pre-implantation pain scores, and participants with higher levels of pain preimplantation were more likely say they would undergo the procedure again. Finally, persons reporting preoperative alcohol problems were more likely to report lower levels of post-SCS pain.

CONCLUSION:

Predictors of pain relief and QOL following SCS may depend on expectations of the device and on individuals' interpretation of pain or psychosocial health.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Medula Espinal / Dor Crônica / Estimulação da Medula Espinal Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Neuromodulation Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Medula Espinal / Dor Crônica / Estimulação da Medula Espinal Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Neuromodulation Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos