Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Complication rates of CT-guided transthoracic lung biopsy: meta-analysis.
Heerink, W J; de Bock, G H; de Jonge, G J; Groen, H J M; Vliegenthart, R; Oudkerk, M.
Afiliação
  • Heerink WJ; Center for Medical Imaging-North East Netherlands, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands. w.j.heerink@umcg.nl.
  • de Bock GH; Department of Radiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands. w.j.heerink@umcg.nl.
  • de Jonge GJ; Center for Medical Imaging-North East Netherlands, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
  • Groen HJ; Department of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
  • Vliegenthart R; Department of Radiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
  • Oudkerk M; Center for Medical Imaging-North East Netherlands, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Eur Radiol ; 27(1): 138-148, 2017 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27108299
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To meta-analyze complication rate in computed tomography (CT)-guided transthoracic lung biopsy and associated risk factors.

METHODS:

Four databases were searched from 1/2000 to 8/2015 for studies reporting complications in CT-guided lung biopsy. Overall and major complication rates were pooled and compared between core biopsy and fine needle aspiration (FNA) using the random-effects model. Risk factors for complications in core biopsy and FNA were identified in meta-regression analysis.

RESULTS:

For core biopsy, 32 articles (8,133 procedures) were included and for FNA, 17 (4,620 procedures). Pooled overall complication rates for core biopsy and FNA were 38.8 % (95 % CI 34.3-43.5 %) and 24.0 % (95 % CI 18.2-30.8 %), respectively. Major complication rates were 5.7 % (95 % CI 4.4-7.4 %) and 4.4 % (95 % CI 2.7-7.0 %), respectively. Overall complication rate was higher for core biopsy compared to FNA (p < 0.001). For FNA, larger needle diameter was a risk factor for overall complications, and increased traversed lung parenchyma and smaller lesion size were risk factors for major complications. For core biopsy, no significant risk factors were identified.

CONCLUSIONS:

In CT-guided lung biopsy, minor complications were common and occurred more often in core biopsy than FNA. Major complication rate was low. For FNA, smaller nodule diameter, larger needle diameter and increased traversed lung parenchyma were risk factors for complications. KEY POINTS • Minor complications are common in CT-guided lung biopsy • Major complication rate is low in CT-guided lung biopsy • CT-guided lung biopsy complications occur more often in core biopsy than FNA • Major complication rate is similar in core biopsy and FNA • Risk factors for FNA are larger needle diameter, smaller lesion size.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pneumotórax / Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X / Biópsia Guiada por Imagem / Pulmão / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudo: Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur Radiol Assunto da revista: RADIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pneumotórax / Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X / Biópsia Guiada por Imagem / Pulmão / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudo: Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur Radiol Assunto da revista: RADIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda