Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Can policy ameliorate socioeconomic inequities in obesity and obesity-related behaviours? A systematic review of the impact of universal policies on adults and children.
Olstad, D L; Teychenne, M; Minaker, L M; Taber, D R; Raine, K D; Nykiforuk, C I J; Ball, K.
Afiliação
  • Olstad DL; Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
  • Teychenne M; Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
  • Minaker LM; Propel Centre for Population Health Impact, Faculty of Applied Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
  • Taber DR; Department of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Austin, TX, USA.
  • Raine KD; School of Public Health, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
  • Nykiforuk CI; School of Public Health, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
  • Ball K; Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Obes Rev ; 17(12): 1198-1217, 2016 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27484468
ABSTRACT
This systematic review examined the impact of universal policies on socioeconomic inequities in obesity, dietary and physical activity behaviours among adults and children. PRISMA-Equity guidelines were followed. Database searches spanned from 2004 to August 2015. Eligible studies assessed the impact of universal policies on anthropometric, dietary or physical activity-related outcomes in adults or children according to socioeconomic position. Thirty-six studies were included. Policies were classified as agentic, agento-structural or structural, and their impact on inequities was rated as positive, neutral, negative or mixed according to the dominant associations observed. Most policies had neutral impacts on obesity-related inequities regardless of whether they were agentic (60% neutral), agento-structural (68% neutral) or structural (67% neutral). The proportion of positive impacts was similar across policy types (10% agentic, 18% agento-structural and 11% structural), with some differences for negative impacts (30% agentic, 14% agento-structural and 22% structural). The majority of associations remained neutral when stratified by participant population, implementation level and socioeconomic position measures and by anthropometric and behavioural outcomes. Fiscal measures had consistently neutral or positive impacts on inequities. Findings suggest an important role for policy in addressing obesity in an equitable manner and strengthen the case for implementing a broad complement of policies spanning the agency-structure continuum.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fatores Socioeconômicos / Obesidade Infantil / Política de Saúde / Obesidade Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Limite: Adult / Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Obes Rev Assunto da revista: METABOLISMO Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fatores Socioeconômicos / Obesidade Infantil / Política de Saúde / Obesidade Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Limite: Adult / Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Obes Rev Assunto da revista: METABOLISMO Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália