Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of competitive exclusion with classical cleaning and disinfection on bacterial load in pig nursery units.
Luyckx, K; Millet, S; Van Weyenberg, S; Herman, L; Heyndrickx, M; Dewulf, J; De Reu, K.
Afiliação
  • Luyckx K; Institute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research (ILVO), Technology and Food Science Unit, Melle, Belgium.
  • Millet S; Institute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research (ILVO), Animal Sciences Unit, Melle, Belgium.
  • Van Weyenberg S; Institute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research (ILVO), Technology and Food Science Unit, Melle, Belgium.
  • Herman L; Institute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research (ILVO), Technology and Food Science Unit, Melle, Belgium.
  • Heyndrickx M; Institute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research (ILVO), Technology and Food Science Unit, Melle, Belgium.
  • Dewulf J; Department of Pathology, Bacteriology and Poultry Diseases, Ghent University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Merelbeke, Belgium.
  • De Reu K; Veterinary Epidemiology Unit, Department of Reproduction, Obstetrics and Herd Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
BMC Vet Res ; 12(1): 189, 2016 Sep 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27600833
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Colonisation of the environment of nursery units by pathogenic micro-organisms is an important factor in the persistence and spread of endemic diseases in pigs and zoonotic pathogens. These pathogens are generally controlled by the use of antibiotics and disinfectants. Since an increasing resistance against these measures has been reported in recent years, methods such as competitive exclusion (CE) are promoted as promising alternatives.

RESULTS:

This study showed that the infection pressure in CE units after microbial cleaning was not reduced to the same degree as in control units. Despite sufficient administration of probiotic-type spores, the analysed bacteria did not decrease in number after 3 production rounds in CE units, indicating no competitive exclusion. In addition, no differences in feed conversion were found between piglets raised in CE and control units in our study. Also, no differences in faecal consistency (indicator for enteric diseases) was noticed.

CONCLUSION:

These results indicate that the CE protocol is not a valuable alternative for classical C&D.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Hidróxido de Sódio / Doenças dos Suínos / Bactérias / Desinfecção / Abrigo para Animais Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: BMC Vet Res Assunto da revista: MEDICINA VETERINARIA Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Bélgica

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Hidróxido de Sódio / Doenças dos Suínos / Bactérias / Desinfecção / Abrigo para Animais Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: BMC Vet Res Assunto da revista: MEDICINA VETERINARIA Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Bélgica