Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Enhanced First Trimester Screening for Trisomy 21 with Contingent Cell-Free Fetal DNA: A Comparative Performance and Cost Analysis.
Huang, Tianhua; Meschino, Wendy S; Teitelbaum, Mari; Dougan, Shelley; Okun, Nan.
Afiliação
  • Huang T; Genetics Program, North York General Hospital, Toronto, ON; Better Outcomes Registry & Network (BORN) Ontario, Ottawa, ON; The Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON. Electronic address: tianhua.huang@nygh.on.ca.
  • Meschino WS; Genetics Program, North York General Hospital, Toronto, ON; Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.
  • Teitelbaum M; Better Outcomes Registry & Network (BORN) Ontario, Ottawa, ON; Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, ON.
  • Dougan S; Better Outcomes Registry & Network (BORN) Ontario, Ottawa, ON.
  • Okun N; Maternal Fetal Medicine Program, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can ; 39(9): 742-749, 2017 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28624447
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Prenatal screening for trisomy 21 is a standard of care. Emerging cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) technologies can improve screening performance, but they are expensive. This study was conducted to propose a contingent screening model that would incorporate cffDNA technology, would remain affordable, and could be applied equitably in a publically funded system.

METHODS:

Using performance and cost parameters from published literature, four prenatal screening strategies were compared. Scenario 1 modelled integrated prenatal screening (first trimester nuchal translucency and biochemical markers from both the first and second trimesters) with no cffDNA. Scenarios 2 and 3 modelled first trimester combined screening (FTS) and "enhanced FTS" (adding serum placental growth factor and alpha fetoprotein to FTS), respectively, with contingent cffDNA following a positive result. Scenario 4 modelled cffDNA as the primary screening test.

RESULTS:

Scenario 1 provides a known detection rate (DR) of 88%, with a false positive rate (FPR) of 3.3%. Scenarios 2 and 3 result in a DR of 94% and overall FPR of 0.59% and 0.33%, respectively, comparable to the DR of 96% and FPR of 0.1% with primary cffDNA (assuming the published test failure rate of 3%). The total cost, cost per woman screened, and cost per case of trisomy 21 detected were lower with scenario 3 (enhanced FTS with contingent cffDNA) compared with primary cffDNA or scenario 2 (FTS with contingent cffDNA).

CONCLUSION:

Enhanced FTS with contingent cffDNA following a positive result provides a similar performance to that of primary cffDNA at a substantially lower cost.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Síndrome de Down / Testes para Triagem do Soro Materno Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: J Obstet Gynaecol Can Assunto da revista: GINECOLOGIA / OBSTETRICIA Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Síndrome de Down / Testes para Triagem do Soro Materno Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: J Obstet Gynaecol Can Assunto da revista: GINECOLOGIA / OBSTETRICIA Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article