Disproportionate fluid sign as an aid in diagnosing high-grade bursal-sided supraspinatus tendon tear.

ABSTRACT

Background Deep, high-grade bursal-sided supraspinatus tendon tears are sometimes preoperatively misinterpreted as full-thickness tears on shoulder magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Purpose To determine the usefulness of disproportionate fluid sign for differentiating high-grade bursal-sided partial-thickness tears from full-thickness tears on conventional MRI. Material and Methods Preoperative MRIs of 198 patients with arthroscopically confirmed high-grade bursal-sided partial-thickness tears and full-thickness tears were independently reviewed by two readers on two occasions. The presence of high-grade bursal-sided partial-thickness tears with a confidence level using a five-point grading scale was assessed based on tear depth alone and also in combination with disproportionate fluid sign, defined as a prominent subdeltoid or subacromial-subdeltoid bursal fluid distension with a relative paucity of effusion in the glenohumeral joint. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated, as well as inter-observer reliability. Results The disproportionate fluid sign was identified in 60/74 (81.2%) bursal-sided partial-thickness tears and 9/124 (7.5%) full-thickness tears. The sensitivity and accuracy of the diagnosis of bursal-sided tear were higher when disproportionate fluid sign was used in conjunction with the tear depth, compared with tear depth alone ( P < 0.001). There was excellent inter-observer agreement for disproportionate fluid sign and deep bursal-sided tear. The AUCs were significantly higher in combination with disproportionate fluid sign. Conclusion The disproportionate fluid sign indicates the presence of a deep, high-grade bursal-sided partial-thickness tear, which can be misinterpreted as a full-thickness tear. Thus, it can provide greater diagnostic assistance to less-experienced radiologists and clinicians.