The impact of route of diagnosis on survival in patients with glioblastoma.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The standard of care for glioblastoma is maximal debulking surgery followed by chemo-radiotherapy (CRT). Published data show worse outcomes for patients who present with GBM as an emergency. This study investigates prognostic factors in a cohort of GBM patients treated with postoperative CRT, and compares outcomes in patients who present via emergency pathways with those who present through outpatient clinics. METHODS: Patients with GBM operated on between 1 April 2010 and 5 October 2015 and then treated with postoperative CRT were included in the study. Data were collected from electronic patient records and radiotherapy planning systems. Survival data were censored on 22 March 2016. Univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors were performed. RESULTS: 104 patients were studied; mean age 51.6 years (range 19 to 70 years). Median overall survival (OS) was 16.5 months, with 68.2% and 37.8% alive at 12 and 24 months respectively. On multivariate analysis, improved OS was associated with ECOG Performance Status of 0 (vs ≥1; p = .012), patient age <60 years (vs ≥60 years; p < .001), and surgical debulking or macroscopic complete resection (vs biopsy; p < .001). Patients who presented through emergency medical pathways had worse survival (p = .005). CONCLUSION: This study supports published data that initial presentation through emergency pathways is associated with worse outcomes in GBM, even in patients who remain fit enough to receive post-operative CRT.