Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Synthesis of thiolated, PEGylated and POZylated silica nanoparticles and evaluation of their retention on rat intestinal mucosa in vitro.
Ways, Twana Mohammed M; Lau, Wing Man; Ng, Keng Wooi; Khutoryanskiy, Vitaliy V.
Afiliação
  • Ways TMM; Reading School of Pharmacy, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading RG6 6AD, United Kingdom.
  • Lau WM; School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, United Kingdom.
  • Ng KW; School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, United Kingdom.
  • Khutoryanskiy VV; Reading School of Pharmacy, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading RG6 6AD, United Kingdom. Electronic address: v.khutoryanskiy@reading.ac.uk.
Eur J Pharm Sci ; 122: 230-238, 2018 Sep 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29969667
ABSTRACT
In this study, we synthesised thiolated silica nanoparticles using 3-mercaptopropyltrimethoxysilane and functionalised them with either 5 kDa methoxy polyethylene glycol maleimide (PEG) or 5 kDa alkyne-terminated poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline) (POZ). The main objectives of this study are to investigate the effects of pH on the size and ξ-potential of these nanoparticles and evaluate their mucoadhesive properties ex vivo using rat intestinal mucosa. The sizes of thiolated, PEGylated and POZylated silica nanoparticles were 53 ±â€¯1, 68 ±â€¯1 and 59 ±â€¯1 nm, respectively. The size of both thiolated and POZylated nanoparticles significantly increased at pH ≤ 2, whereas no size change was observed at pH 2.5-9 for both these two types of nanoparticles. On the other hand, the size of PEGylated nanoparticles did not change over the studied pH range (1.5-9). Moreover, thiolated nanoparticles were more mucoadhesive in the rat small intestine than both PEGylated and POZylated nanoparticles. After 12 cycles of washing (with a total of 20 mL of phosphate buffer solution pH 6.8), a significantly greater amount of thiolated nanoparticles remained on the intestinal mucosa than FITC-dextran (non-mucoadhesive polymer, p < 0.005) and both PEGylated and POZylated nanoparticles (p < 0.05 both). However, both PEGylated and POZylated nanoparticles showed similar retention to FITC-dextran (p > 0.1 for both). Thus, this study indicates that thiolated nanoparticles are mucoadhesive, whereas PEGylated and POZylated nanoparticles are non-mucoadhesive in the ex vivo rat intestinal mucosa model. Each of these nanoparticles has potential applications in mucosal drug delivery.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Poliaminas / Polietilenoglicóis / Silanos / Compostos de Sulfidrila / Dióxido de Silício / Nanopartículas / Mucosa Intestinal Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Pharm Sci Assunto da revista: FARMACIA / FARMACOLOGIA / QUIMICA Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Poliaminas / Polietilenoglicóis / Silanos / Compostos de Sulfidrila / Dióxido de Silício / Nanopartículas / Mucosa Intestinal Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Pharm Sci Assunto da revista: FARMACIA / FARMACOLOGIA / QUIMICA Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido