Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A purpose-designed monofilament-fibre pad for debridement of hard-to-reach wounds: experience in clinical practice.
Dissemond, Joachim; Eberlein, Thomas; Bültemann, Anke; Riepe, Gunnar; Stoffels, Ingo; Stephen-Haynes, Jackie; Roes, Claas; Abel, Martin.
Afiliação
  • Dissemond J; University School of Medicine Essen, Department of Dermatology, Venerology and Allergology, Germany.
  • Eberlein T; Dermatologist; German Wound Academy DWA, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Bültemann A; Paediatric Nurse/Specialised Caregiver; Asklepios Klinikum Harburg, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Riepe G; Gemeinschaftsklinikum Mittelrhein gGmbH, Boppard, Germany.
  • Stoffels I; Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
  • Stephen-Haynes J; Professor, Consultant Nurse in Tissue Viability; Worcestershire Health and Care NHS Trust, Worcester, UK.
  • Roes C; Lohmann & Rauscher GmbH & Co. KG, Rengsdorf, Germany.
  • Abel M; Lohmann & Rauscher GmbH & Co. KG, Rengsdorf, Germany.
J Wound Care ; 27(7): 421-425, 2018 07 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30016141
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Effective and comfortable debridement is an important part of managing complex wounds. This user test evaluated a monofilament-fibre pad (with handle) (Debrisoft Lolly, Lohmann & Rauscher GmbH & Co. KG) in the debridement of various hard-to-reach wounds.

METHOD:

The multicentre, international user test was performed by experienced physicians and nurses in Germany and the UK, who used the monofilament-fibre pad in their clinical practice. After debridement, using the monofilament-fibre pad, the clinicians completed an evaluation questionnaire. The assessment comprised of performance, usability, tolerability, safety and suitability of the device for debridement, comparing it with standard methods used in the clinicians' centres.

RESULTS:

A total of 23 clinicians in 20 centres each treated between six and 10 patients with the monofilament-fibre pad (a total of 155 wounds of different aetiologies). Most participating patients had deep wounds (n=63 (41%)) or cavity (n=31 (20%)) wounds. When compared with the standard debridement method used at the centres, the tested device was scored as 'easier' or 'equally easy' to use in all cases. When comparing the standard debridement procedure with the monofilament-fibre pad, debridement duration was reported as equal to or shorter than the standard method in 90% of cases when using the monofilament-fibre pad. Debridement efficacy was scored by the clinician as 'better' or 'equal' for the monofilament-fibre pad in 67% of cases. Overall, patients reported that the study device was comfortable.

CONCLUSION:

The monofilament-fibre pad effectively, easily and safely removed slough and debris from wounds of various aetiologies and was effective in wounds of different shapes, such as in cavity wounds and those in hard-to-reach locations.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Úlcera Cutânea / Cicatrização / Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde / Desbridamento Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Evaluation_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: J Wound Care Assunto da revista: ENFERMAGEM Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Úlcera Cutânea / Cicatrização / Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde / Desbridamento Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Evaluation_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: J Wound Care Assunto da revista: ENFERMAGEM Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha