Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A comparison of two types of microcatheters used for a novel external carotid arterial sheath system for intra-arterial chemotherapy of head and neck cancer.
Nomura, Miwako; Fuwa, Nobukazu; Toyomasu, Yutaka; Takada, Akinori; Ii, Noriko; Nomura, Jouji; Yamada, Hiroyuki.
Afiliação
  • Nomura M; Department of Radiation Oncology, Ise Red Cross Hospital, 471-2 Funae 1 Choume, Ise-shi, Mie, 516-8512, Japan. mn51ss@gmail.com.
  • Fuwa N; Department of Radiation Oncology, Ise Red Cross Hospital, 471-2 Funae 1 Choume, Ise-shi, Mie, 516-8512, Japan.
  • Toyomasu Y; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mie University Hospital, 174 Edobashi 2 Choume, Tsu-shi, Mie, 514-8507, Japan.
  • Takada A; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mie University Hospital, 174 Edobashi 2 Choume, Tsu-shi, Mie, 514-8507, Japan.
  • Ii N; Department of Radiation Oncology, Ise Red Cross Hospital, 471-2 Funae 1 Choume, Ise-shi, Mie, 516-8512, Japan.
  • Nomura J; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ise Red Cross Hospital, 471-2 Funae 1 Choume, Ise-shi, Mie, 516-8512, Japan.
  • Yamada H; Department of Head and Neck Otorhinolaryngology, Ise Red Cross Hospital, 471-2 Funae 1 Choume, Ise-shi, Mie, 516-8512, Japan.
Jpn J Radiol ; 36(10): 622-628, 2018 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30121891
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

We developed an external carotid arterial sheath (ECAS) for performing intra-arterial chemotherapy (IACT) via the superficial temporal artery for head and neck cancer. This study aimed to assess the potential of a novel microcatheter with a steerable tip inserted through the ECAS in comparison to an existing hook-type microcatheter. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

The same operator used two types of microcatheters alternately for each weekly IACT session with the same patient, and the fluoroscopy time required for catheterization and the arterial selectivity of each microcatheter were compared.

RESULTS:

Ten patients with advanced head and neck cancer were enrolled. The steerable microcatheter significantly shortened the fluoroscopy time required for catheterization in comparison to the hook-type microcatheter (45.9 ± 4.8 vs 70.2 ± 9.8 s, p < 0.02). The arterial selectivity was equivalent [97.1%, (34/35) vs 88.6%, (31/35), p = 0.36]. No serious adverse events were observed in association with the procedure.

CONCLUSION:

In combination with an ECAS, the steerable microcatheter might be more useful than the hook-type microcatheter.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cateterismo / Artérias Carótidas / Catéteres / Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Jpn J Radiol Assunto da revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / RADIOLOGIA / RADIOTERAPIA Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Japão

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cateterismo / Artérias Carótidas / Catéteres / Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Jpn J Radiol Assunto da revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / RADIOLOGIA / RADIOTERAPIA Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Japão