A comparison of various intragastric balloons for the assessment of gastric motility.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is a clear need for a novel method to readily assess gastric motility in daily clinical practice. METHODS: In a crossover design, 10 noncompliant balloons of different shape and volume (25-350 mL), attached to a classic feeding tube, were introduced in the stomach of eight healthy volunteers. In the same experiment, a High-Resolution Manometry (HRM) catheter was positioned throughout the stomach. Gastric motility was recorded during fasting (2 hours) and liquid nutrient administration (30 minutes). Motility was quantified using a peak detection algorithm. Symptoms were recorded throughout the experiment using visual analog scales (100 mm). Results are presented as mean ± SD. KEY RESULTS: The % time during which motility-induced pressure increments could be detected with HRM but not by the balloon varied from 42 ± 24% in the smallest (25 mL) balloon to 1 ± 1% in the 330 mL balloon. On the other hand, bloating, discomfort and nausea scores were 0 ± 0, 0 ± 0 and 2 ± 5 mm, respectively, for the smallest balloon (25 mL) while these scores were 28 ± 38, 13 ± 30, and 38 ± 30 mm, respectively, for the largest balloon (350 mL). A phase III contraction pattern was consistently evoked in balloons with a volume >200 mL. CONCLUSION: Gastric motility could be assessed more accurately with larger volume balloons, while epigastric symptoms were evoked with increasing balloon volume. The optimal balloon to measure gastric motility has a 5 cm diameter and is 11 cm long (210 mL). A nasogastric balloon catheter can now be developed that enables relatively easy monitoring of gastric motility in patients with epigastric symptoms.