Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of treatment options for small to medium congenital melanocytic nevi: A retrospective review of 119 cases.
Lim, Jung Min; Oh, Yeongjoo; Lee, Si-Hyung; Cho, Mi Yeon; Chung, Kee Yang; Roh, Mi Ryung.
Afiliação
  • Lim JM; Department of Dermatology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Cutaneous Biology Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Oh Y; Department of Dermatology, Severance Hospital, Cutaneous Biology Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Lee SH; Department of Dermatology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
  • Cho MY; Institute of Human Environment Interface Biology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
  • Chung KY; Department of Dermatology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Cutaneous Biology Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Roh MR; Department of Dermatology, Severance Hospital, Cutaneous Biology Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Lasers Surg Med ; 51(1): 62-67, 2019 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30375012
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

For small to medium sized congenital melanocytic nevi (CMN), the treatment of choice is staged surgical excision. Ablative lasers or pigment-specific lasers have also been recommended for lesions difficult for surgical removal or to avoid surgery. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the results of several treatment options for CMN to find out the optimal treatment method.

METHODS:

Patients with small to medium sized CMN were retrospectively reviewed. Treatment options were categorized into four groups (i) Excision only; (ii) Excision followed by scar laser; (iii) Excision followed by pigment-specific laser; and (iv) Laser only. Treatment response was assessed by investigator's global assessment (IGA) score on a seven-point scale.

RESULTS:

A total of 119 cases were included. Lesions were most commonly located on the face (59/119, 49.6%), measured 2 ∼ 10 cm in size (72/119, 60.5%), and treated with excision only (50/119, 42.0%). Among treatment options, excision followed by scar laser showed the highest IGA score of 6.38. Options including surgical methods showed higher IGA scores compared to laser-only treatment (P < 0.01). Staged excisions and single excisions showed no difference in IGA scores. Patient satisfaction scores increased after scar laser treatment of the staged excision scar.

CONCLUSIONS:

For the treatment of small to medium sized CMN, treatment strategies including surgical methods are cosmetically superior to laser-only treatment. Also, the combination of surgical excision with scar laser has the potential for better clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction. Lasers Surg. Med. 5162-67, 2019. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Terapia a Laser / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Dermatológicos / Nevo Pigmentado Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male / Middle aged / Newborn País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Lasers Surg Med Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Terapia a Laser / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Dermatológicos / Nevo Pigmentado Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male / Middle aged / Newborn País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Lasers Surg Med Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article