Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of Cough, Wheeze and Sustained Phonations for Automatic Classification Between Healthy Subjects and Asthmatic Patients.
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc ; 2018: 1400-1403, 2018 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30440654
ABSTRACT
In this work, we consider the task of automatic classification of asthmatic patients and healthy subjects using voice stimuli. Cough and wheeze have been used as voice stimuli for this classification task in the past. In this work, we focus on sustained phonations, namely /aː/, /iː/, /uː/, /eɪ/, /o℧/ and compare their classification performances with the cough and wheeze. Classification experiments using 35 asthmatic patients and 36 healthy subjects show that sustained vowel /iː/ achieves the highest classification accuracy of 80.79% among five vowels considered. However, it is found to be higher and lower than the classification accuracies of 78.72% and 90.25% obtained using cough and wheeze respectively. This suggests that for speech-based asthma classification, /iː/ would be a better choice compared to other vowels considered in this work. However, when non-speech sounds are included for classification, wheeze is a better choice than sustained /iː/.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Asma / Tosse Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Asma / Tosse Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article