Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Use of an innovative and non-invasive device for virologic sampling of cough aerosols in patients with community and hospital acquired pneumonia: a pilot study.
Patrucco, Filippo; Gavelli, Francesco; Ravanini, Paolo; Daverio, Matteo; Statti, Giulia; Castello, Luigi Mario; Andreoni, Stefano; Balbo, Piero Emilio.
Afiliação
  • Patrucco F; Medical Department, Division of Respiratory Diseases, University of Piemonte Orientale, Maggiore della Carità Hospital, Novara, Italy.
J Breath Res ; 13(2): 021001, 2019 03 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30523983
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The aetiology of lower respiratory tract infections is challenging to investigate. Despite the wide array of diagnostic tools, invasive techniques, such as bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), are often required to obtain adequate specimens. PneumoniaCheckTM is a new device that collects aerosol particles from cough, allowing microbiological analyses. Up to now it has been tested only for bacteria detection, but no study has investigated its usefulness for virus identification.

METHODS:

In this pilot study we included 12 consecutive patients with pneumonia. After testing cough adequacy via a peak flow meter, a sampling with PneumoniaCheckTM was collected and a BAL was performed in each patient. Microbiological analyses for virus identification were performed on each sample and concordance between the two techniques was tested (sensitivity, specificity and positive/negative predictive values), taking BAL results as reference.

RESULTS:

BAL was considered adequate in 10 patients. Among them, a viral pathogen was identified by PneumoniaCheckTM 6 times, each on different samples, whereas BAL allowed to detect the presence of a virus on 7 patients (14 positivities). Overall, the specificity for PneumoniaCheckTM to detect a virus was 100%, whereas the sensitivity was 66%. When considering only herpes viruses, PneumoniaCheckTM showed a lower sensitivity, detecting a virus in 1/4 of infected patients (25%).

CONCLUSIONS:

In this pilot study PneumoniaCheckTM showed a good correlation with BAL for non-herpes virologic identification in pneumonia patients, providing excellent specificity. Further studies on larger population are needed to confirm these results and define its place in the panorama of rapid diagnostic tests for lower respiratory tract infections.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tosse / Aerossóis / Pneumonia Associada a Assistência à Saúde Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Breath Res Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tosse / Aerossóis / Pneumonia Associada a Assistência à Saúde Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Breath Res Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália