Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Heat Strain Decision Aid (HSDA) accurately predicts individual-based core body temperature rise while wearing chemical protective clothing.
Potter, Adam W; Hunt, Andrew P; Cadarette, Bruce S; Fogarty, Alison; Srinivasan, Shankar; Santee, William R; Blanchard, Laurie A; Looney, David P.
Afiliação
  • Potter AW; Biophysics and Biomedical Modeling Division, U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, 10 General Greene Avenue, Bldg 42, Natick, MA 01760, USA; Rutgers University, School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Newark, NJ, 07102, USA. Electronic address: adam.w.potter.civ@mail.mil.
  • Hunt AP; Land Division, Defence Science and Technology Group, Department of Defence, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences & Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. Electronic address: andrew.hunt2@dst.de
  • Cadarette BS; Thermal and Mountain Medicine Division, U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, 10 General Greene Avenue, Bldg 42, Natick, MA 01760, USA. Electronic address: bruce.s.cadarette.civ@mail.mil.
  • Fogarty A; Land Division, Defence Science and Technology Group, Department of Defence, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. Electronic address: alison.fogarty@dsto.defence.gov.au.
  • Srinivasan S; Rutgers University, School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Newark, NJ, 07102, USA. Electronic address: srinivsh@shp.rutgers.edu.
  • Santee WR; Biophysics and Biomedical Modeling Division, U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, 10 General Greene Avenue, Bldg 42, Natick, MA 01760, USA; Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE), 1299 Bethel Valley Rd, Oak Ridge, TN, 37830, USA. Electronic address: william.r.santee
  • Blanchard LA; Biophysics and Biomedical Modeling Division, U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, 10 General Greene Avenue, Bldg 42, Natick, MA 01760, USA. Electronic address: laurie.a.blanchard4.civ@mail.mil.
  • Looney DP; Biophysics and Biomedical Modeling Division, U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, 10 General Greene Avenue, Bldg 42, Natick, MA 01760, USA. Electronic address: david.p.looney4.civ@mail.mil.
Comput Biol Med ; 107: 131-136, 2019 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30802695
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

We examined the accuracy of the Heat Strain Decision Aid (HSDA) as a predictor of core body temperature in healthy individuals wearing chemical protective clothing during laboratory and field exercises in hot and humid conditions.

METHODS:

The laboratory experiment examined three chemical protective clothing ensembles in eight male volunteers (age 24 ±â€¯6 years; height 178 ±â€¯5 cm; body mass 76.6 ±â€¯8.4 kg) during intermittent treadmill marching in an environmental chamber (air temperature 29.3 ±â€¯0.1 °C; relative humidity 56 ±â€¯1%; wind speed 0.4 ±â€¯0.1 m s-1). The field experiment examined four different chemical protective clothing ensembles in twenty activity military volunteers (26 ±â€¯5 years; 175 ±â€¯8 cm; 80.2 ±â€¯12.1 kg) during a prolonged road march (26.0 ±â€¯0.5 °C; 55 ±â€¯3%; 4.3 ±â€¯0.7 m s-1). Predictive accuracy and precision were evaluated by the bias, mean absolute error (MAE), and root mean square error (RMSE). Additionally, accuracy was evaluated using a prediction bias of ±0.27 °C as an acceptable limit and by comparing predictions to observations within the standard deviation (SD) of the observed data.

RESULTS:

Core body temperature predictions were accurate for each chemical protective clothing ensemble in laboratory (Bias -0.10 ±â€¯0.36 °C; MAE 0.28 ±â€¯0.24 °C; RMSE 0.37 ±â€¯0.24 °C) and field experiments (Bias 0.23 ±â€¯0.32 °C; MAE 0.30 ±â€¯0.25 °C; RMSE 0.40 ±â€¯0.25 °C). From all modeled data, 72% of all predictions were within one standard deviation of the observed data including 92% of predictions for the laboratory experiment (SD ±â€¯0.64 °C) and 67% for the field experiment (SD ±â€¯0.38 °C). Individual-based predictions showed modest errors outside the SD range with 98% of predictions falling <1 °C; while, 81% of all errors were within 0.5 °C of observed data.

CONCLUSION:

The HSDA acceptably predicts core body temperature when wearing chemical protective clothing during laboratory and field exercises in hot and humid conditions.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Roupa de Proteção / Temperatura Corporal / Regulação da Temperatura Corporal / Modelos Estatísticos / Termometria Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Comput Biol Med Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Roupa de Proteção / Temperatura Corporal / Regulação da Temperatura Corporal / Modelos Estatísticos / Termometria Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Comput Biol Med Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article