Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Transition from fresh frozen plasma to solvent/detergent plasma in the Netherlands: comparing clinical use and transfusion reaction risks.
Saadah, Nicholas H; Schipperus, Martin R; Wiersum-Osselton, Johanna C; van Kraaij, Marian G; Caram-Deelder, Camila; Beckers, Erik A M; Leyte, Anja; Rondeel, Jan M M; de Vooght, Karen M K; Weerkamp, Floor; Zwaginga, Jaap Jan; van der Bom, Johanna G.
Afiliação
  • Saadah NH; Jon J. van Rood Centre for Clinical Transfusion Research, Sanquin Research, Leiden.
  • Schipperus MR; Deptartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden.
  • Wiersum-Osselton JC; TRIP, National Hemovigilance & Biovigilance Office, Leiden.
  • van Kraaij MG; TRIP, National Hemovigilance & Biovigilance Office, Leiden.
  • Caram-Deelder C; Haga Teaching Hospital, Department of Haematology, The Hague.
  • Beckers EAM; TRIP, National Hemovigilance & Biovigilance Office, Leiden.
  • Leyte A; Donor Affairs, Sanquin Blood Supply, Leiden.
  • Rondeel JMM; Donor Affairs, Sanquin Blood Supply, Leiden.
  • de Vooght KMK; Department of Transfusion Medicine, Sanquin Blood Supply, Amsterdam.
  • Weerkamp F; Jon J. van Rood Centre for Clinical Transfusion Research, Sanquin Research, Leiden.
  • Zwaginga JJ; Deptartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden.
  • van der Bom JG; Department of Haematology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht.
Haematologica ; 105(4): 1158-1165, 2020 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31273090
ABSTRACT
Plasma transfusion is indicated for replenishment of coagulative proteins to stop or prevent bleeding. In 2014, the Netherlands switched from using ~300mL fresh frozen plasma (FFP) units to using 200mL Omniplasma, a solvent/detergent treated pooled plasma (SD plasma), units. We evaluated the effect of the introduction of SD plasma on clinical plasma use, associated bleeding, and transfusion reaction incidences. Using diagnostic data from six Dutch hospitals, national blood bank data, and national hemovigilance data for 2011 to 2017, we compared the plasma/red blood cell (RBC) units ratio (f) and the mean number of plasma and RBC units transfused for FFP (~300mL) and SD plasma (200mL) for various patient groups, and calculated odds ratios comparing their associated transfusion reaction risks. Analyzing 13,910 transfusion episodes, the difference (Δf = fSD - fFFP) in mean plasma/RBC ratio (f) was negligible (Δfentire_cohort = 0.01 [95% confidence interval (CI) -0.02 - 0.05]; P=0.48). SD plasma was associated with fewer RBC units transfused per episode in gynecological (difference of mean number of units -1.66 [95% CI -2.72, -0.61]) and aneurysm (-0.97 [-1.59, -0.35]) patients. SD plasma was further associated with fewer anaphylactic reactions than FFP (odds ratio 0.37 [0.18, 0.77; P<0.01]) while the differences for most transfusion reactions were not statistically significant. SD plasma units, despite being one third smaller in volume than FFP units, are not associated with a higher plasma/RBC ratio. SD plasma is associated with fewer anaphylactic reactions than FFP plasma/RBC units ratio.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Plasma / Reação Transfusional Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Haematologica Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Plasma / Reação Transfusional Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Haematologica Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article